Rating of perceived exception

from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In sport, and especially in stress tests, the Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) , measured using the Borg scale for physical exertion (RPE scale), is a frequently used quantitative measure of the perceived exertion during physical activity. In medicine, this is used to document the patient's exertion during a test. Sports coaches use the scale to assess the intensity of training and competition. The original scale developed by Gunnar Borg shows the effort on a scale from 6–20. Borg then constructed a category (English: Category, C) ratio (English: Ratio, R) scale, the Borg CR10 scale. It is mainly used in clinical diagnostics for breathlessness and dyspnea , chest pain , angina pectoris and pain in the musculoskeletal system.

The Borg scale is comparable to other linear scales such as the Likert scale and the visual analog scale . The sensitivity and reproducibility of the results are for the most part very similar, however the Borg scale outperforms the Likert scale in some cases.

Importance of values

The Borg RPE scale is a numeric scale that ranges from 6 to 20. The rating 6 stands for "no effort at all" and the rating 20 for "maximum effort". In order to carry out a measurement, a value is chosen that best describes the exertion during a physical activity carried out. For the conception of the scale, the values ​​were set in such a way that the Borg value multiplied by 10 roughly corresponds to the heart rate of a young, healthy test person.

  • 6 - No effort
  • 7 - Extremely light
  • 8th
  • 9 - Very easy
  • 10
  • 11 - Easy
  • 12
  • 13 - A little difficult
  • 14th
  • 15 - Difficult
  • 16
  • 17 - Very difficult
  • 18th
  • 19 - Extremely difficult
  • 20 - Maximum effort

Use in strength training

Traditionally, the rating of perceived exertion was used to measure exertion and to regulate the intensity during aerobic exercise. More recently, however, RPE-based methods have also been used for intra-training feedback on the perceived exertion during explosive strength training. This is intended to enable exercisers to control the intensity in such a way that the power output can be maximized and the total fatigue of a single workout can be measured.

Individual evidence

  1. ^ Borg GA: Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion . In: Med Sci Sports Exerc . tape 14 , no. 5 , 1982, pp. 377-81 , doi : 10.1249 / 00005768-198205000-00012 , PMID 7154893 .
  2. Borg G: Perceived exertion as in indicator of somatic stress . In: Scand J Rehabil Med . tape 2 , no. 2 , 1970, p. 92-8 , PMID 5523831 .
  3. a b Dawes HN, Barker KL, Cockburn J, Roach N, Scott O, Wade D: Borg's rating of perceived exertion scales: do the verbal anchors mean the same for different clinical groups? In: Arch Phys Med Rehabil . tape 86 , no. 5 , 2005, p. 912-6 , doi : 10.1016 / j.apmr.2004.10.043 , PMID 15895336 .
  4. Roelands B, de Koning J, Foster C, Hettinga F, Meeusen R: Neurophysiological determinants of theoretical concepts and mechanisms involved in pacing . In: Sports Med. Band 43 , no. 5 , May 2013, p. 301–311 , doi : 10.1007 / s40279-013-0030-4 , PMID 23456493 : "A component that appears to integrate many variables during whole-body exercise is the rating of perceived exertion (RPE)"
  5. ^ Borg G: Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. In: Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise . tape 14 , no. 5 , 1982, pp. 377-81 , PMID 7154893 .
  6. Rattray B, Argus C, Martin K, Northey J, Driller M: Is it time to turn our attention toward central mechanisms for post-exertional recovery strategies and performance? In: Front. Physiol. tape 6 , March 2015, p. 79 , doi : 10.3389 / fphys.2015.00079 , PMID 25852568 , PMC 4362407 (free full text): "Aside from accounting for the reduced performance of mentally fatigued participants, this model rationalizes the reduced RPE and hence improved cycling time trial performance of athletes using a glucose mouthwash and the greater power output during a RPE matched cycling time trial following amphetamine ingestion "
  7. Chambers ES, Bridge MW, Jones DA: Carbohydrate sensing in the human mouth: effects on exercise performance and brain activity . In: The Journal of Physiology . tape 587 , no. 8 , April 15, 2009, p. 1779–1794 , doi : 10.1113 / jphysiol.2008.164285 , PMID 19237430 , PMC 2683964 (free full text).
  8. ^ Grant S, Aitchison T, Henderson E, Christie J, Zare S, McMurray J, Dargie H: A Comparison of the Reproducibility and the Sensitivity to Change of Visual Analogue Scales, Borg Scales, and Likert Scales in Normal Subjects During Submaximal Exercise . In: Chest . tape 116 , no. 5 , 1999, p. 1208-1217 , doi : 10.1378 / chest.116.5.1208 , PMID 10559077 .
  9. Perceived Exertion (Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale). CDC, April 10, 2020, accessed May 18, 2020 .
  10. Zourdos MC, Klemp A, Dolan C, Quiles JM, Schau KA, Jo E, Helms E, Esgro B, Duncan S, Garcia Merino S, Blanco R: Novel Resistance Training - Specific Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale Measuring Repetitions in Reserve . In: The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research . tape 30 , no. 1 , 2016, p. 267-275 , doi : 10.1519 / JSC.0000000000001049 .

Web links