Let be a ring expansion of two commutative rings with the same element . Are and prime ideals, one says lie above , if .
If a prime ideal, then a prime ideal is in and is above . If a whole ring expansion and a prime ideal chain with real inclusions is in , then a prime ideal chain with real inclusions is in . Here we are looking into the question of whether, conversely, one can "lift" prime ideal chains in to such , so that the prime ideals of the chain in lie above those of the given chain in . To do this, one must first ensure that there are always prime ideals above the prime ideals .
If one looks at the ring expansion and is a prime number, the main ideal generated is a prime ideal and there is no prime ideal that is above . If, however, it is a whole ring expansion, one can show that there is always a prime ideal above every prime ideal .
So if a whole ring expansion and a prime ideal chain is in , one can find
an overlying prime ideal for each . The question now arises as to whether one can also choose them in such a way that they form an ascending chain. This is exactly the question that Cohen-Seidenberg's statements answer.
Going up
Let it be a whole ring expansion, a prime ideal chain in and the prime ideal lie above :
Then there is the lying prime ideals , which form an ascending chain:
Going down
If, in the situation of the going up sentence, one begins with an overlying prime ideal instead of an overlying prime ideal , additional requirements are required for an analogous statement:
Let it be a whole ring expansion of integrity rings with normal , be a prime ideal chain in and the prime ideal lie above :
Then there is the lying prime ideals , which form an ascending chain:
meaning
Prime ideal chains play an important role in calculating the dimension of a ring. The going up sentence immediately results in a whole ring expansion . The going down phrase can be used to