Dual polyhedron: Revision history

Filter revisionsshowhide

To date:

Tag filter:

Invert selection

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

curprev 09:1109:11, 25 January 2024‎ Steelpillow talk contribs‎ 19,305 bytes −29‎ Undid revision 1198771169 by Obtuse Wombat (talk) more confusing to move from plural to singular mid-flight. undo Tag: Undo
curprev 01:1101:11, 25 January 2024‎ Obtuse Wombat talk contribs‎ 19,334 bytes +29‎ Reword for clarity (to better specify the edge-to-edge correspondence). undo Tag: Reverted

curprev 06:1406:14, 26 November 2023‎ Double sharp talk contribs‎ m 19,305 bytes +32‎ →‎Self-dual polytopes and tessellations undo

curprev 14:1014:10, 29 September 2023‎ Qalle2 talk contribs‎ 19,273 bytes −4‎ jpg → svg; lowercase <br> undo

curprev 11:5411:54, 8 October 2022‎ 92.72.139.189 talk‎ 19,277 bytes +1‎ No edit summary undo

curprev 08:0808:08, 6 September 2022‎ John of Reading talk contribs‎ m 19,276 bytes 0‎ →‎top: Typo fixing, replaced: vice-versa → vice versa undo Tag: AWB

curprev 09:4809:48, 23 August 2022‎ Steelpillow talk contribs‎ 19,276 bytes −10‎ →‎top: there are other kinds of reciprocity undo
curprev 09:4409:44, 23 August 2022‎ Steelpillow talk contribs‎ 19,286 bytes +21‎ →‎top: more specific about what is and is not undo

curprev 16:4916:49, 25 April 2022‎ Erel Segal talk contribs‎ 19,265 bytes +30‎ →‎Self-dual polyhedra undo Tag: Visual edit

curprev 09:0309:03, 3 February 2022‎ 103.98.63.104 talk‎ 19,235 bytes −182‎ Removed 'please clarifiy's on 'self dual'; it is abundantly clear what self-dual means and is explained in the paragraphs above. undo Tag: Visual edit

curprev 11:5511:55, 6 October 2021‎ 2405:201:a803:1106:c985:dce0:3a99:548 talk‎ 19,417 bytes +2‎ Fixed grammar undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

curprev 14:1914:19, 20 September 2021‎ JavBol talk contribs‎ m 19,415 bytes +25‎ Replaced internal bluelink: [#Dorman Luke construction|Dorman Luke construction], with "external" bluelink: [Dual uniform polyhedron#Dorman Luke construction|Dorman Luke construction]; replaced "described below" with "(mentioned below)". undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
curprev 08:2708:27, 20 September 2021‎ Steelpillow talk contribs‎ 19,390 bytes −1,232‎ →‎Polar reciprocation: move DL construction to Uniform dual polyhedron per discussion undo

curprev 16:5716:57, 25 August 2021‎ JavBol talk contribs‎ 20,622 bytes +21‎ ##Polar reciprocation: 4 little homogeneity/specification/clarity improvements undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

curprev 05:1405:14, 24 August 2021‎ Steelpillow talk contribs‎ 20,601 bytes 0‎ →‎Polar reciprocation: swap subsections - DL is an example of canonical arrangement undo
curprev 04:5604:56, 24 August 2021‎ Steelpillow talk contribs‎ m 20,601 bytes +2‎ →‎Dorman Luke construction: lower subtopic undo
curprev 04:5504:55, 24 August 2021‎ Steelpillow talk contribs‎ 20,599 bytes +2‎ Dorman Luke as a subtopic of polar reciprocation undo

curprev 21:1121:11, 23 August 2021‎ JavBol talk contribs‎ 20,597 bytes +23‎ ##Polar reciprocation: Several little homogeneity/phrasing/specification/clarity improvements undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
curprev 18:2618:26, 23 August 2021‎ Steelpillow talk contribs‎ 20,574 bytes +1,673‎ Undid revision 1040282154 by David Eppstein (talk) Reverting prior to opening discussion, per WP:BRD undo Tag: Undo
curprev 17:1717:17, 23 August 2021‎ David Eppstein talk contribs‎ 18,901 bytes −1,673‎ Dorman Luke construction does not actually use polar reciprocation (it avoids it by doing something else equivalent), so saying that it uses a symmetry-centered sphere is misleading. Move entire section to Catalan solid article as threatened on talk. undo Tag: Reverted

curprev 16:3816:38, 22 August 2021‎ David Eppstein talk contribs‎ 20,574 bytes −15‎ Undid revision 1040073378 by JavBol (talk) "convenient" is an opinion and needs a published source undo Tag: Undo
curprev 14:0114:01, 22 August 2021‎ JavBol talk contribs‎ 20,589 bytes +15‎ ##Polar reciprocation: Replaced "this can be used" with "this is convenient to use", because sentence just after that claims "it is possible to reciprocate a polyhedron about any sphere". + Little specification undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

curprev 16:1716:17, 21 August 2021‎ JavBol talk contribs‎ 20,574 bytes +173‎ ##Polar reciprocation: Instead, added: "Failing that, for a polyhedron with a circumscribed sphere, inscribed sphere, or midsphere (one with all edges as tangents), this can be used." Added # internal link to "Dorman Luke construction". undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
curprev 07:0807:08, 21 August 2021‎ David Eppstein talk contribs‎ m 20,401 bytes −137‎ Reverted edits by 2806:106E:16:6FC0:AD4B:856:4DB3:F575 (talk) to last version by David Eppstein undo Tag: Rollback
curprev 05:3905:39, 21 August 2021‎ 2806:106e:16:6fc0:ad4b:856:4db3:f575 talk‎ 20,538 bytes +137‎ →‎Dorman Luke construction undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

curprev 18:0918:09, 20 August 2021‎ David Eppstein talk contribs‎ 20,401 bytes −120‎ Undid revision 1039766824 by JavBol (talk) Removed because there is no evidence that this is "commonly used" and because in almost all non-symmetric polyhedra these spheres do not exist undo Tag: Undo
curprev 16:2716:27, 20 August 2021‎ JavBol talk contribs‎ 20,521 bytes +120‎ Restored surprisingly removed sentence: "Failing that, a circumscribed sphere, inscribed sphere, or midsphere (one with all edges as tangents) is commonly used." Indeed: "Failing that" now makes clear sense, by referring to "a center of symmetry" in clarified sentence just before. PS: Could not reach source editor, so could not add # internal link to "Dorman Luke construction [described below]"... (?) undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

curprev 14:4414:44, 12 August 2021‎ David Eppstein talk contribs‎ 20,401 bytes −299‎ →‎Polar reciprocation: simplify; we don't need to attempt to classify symmetries here undo

curprev 22:5422:54, 3 August 2021‎ David Eppstein talk contribs‎ 20,700 bytes +12‎ →‎Polar reciprocation: center of the sphere undo

curprev 22:2022:20, 2 August 2021‎ JavBol talk contribs‎ m 20,688 bytes +2‎ In definition formula for P^0: Replaced "q \mid q · p" (unclear to non-mathematician readers) with "q \big| q · p" (slightly clearer). @User:JayBeeEll: "\big|" does not work like "\mid", so i had to use 2 "~" spaces; please don't remove these; thanks. undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

curprev 16:4216:42, 28 July 2021‎ David Eppstein talk contribs‎ 20,686 bytes −13‎ shorter shortdesc undo
curprev 16:2616:26, 28 July 2021‎ Jarrod Baniqued talk contribs‎ 20,699 bytes +4‎ No edit summary undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit
curprev 16:2616:26, 28 July 2021‎ Jarrod Baniqued talk contribs‎ m 20,695 bytes +97‎ No edit summary undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit

curprev 22:3922:39, 12 July 2021‎ JavBol talk contribs‎ 20,598 bytes +2‎ In top part: Added "[...]" just after "equivalent", twice. In #Dorman Luke construction: Used more standard phrasing. undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

curprev 13:1613:16, 10 July 2021‎ JavBol talk contribs‎ 20,596 bytes +110‎ In #Dorman Luke construction: Fixed typos; added a necessary specification, & another specification. undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

curprev 23:3623:36, 9 July 2021‎ JayBeeEll talk contribs‎ m 20,486 bytes +12‎ apparently this is what was meant undo
curprev 18:4118:41, 9 July 2021‎ JayBeeEll talk contribs‎ 20,474 bytes +8‎ refining JavBol's recent edits (mostly for basic grammar / idiom) undo

curprev 15:3915:39, 8 July 2021‎ JavBol talk contribs‎ 20,466 bytes +28‎ Added (& bluelinked) "In Euclidean space" at very beginning of ##Polar reciprocation, as this uses dot product. undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

curprev 21:3121:31, 7 July 2021‎ JavBol talk contribs‎ 20,438 bytes −45‎ Dorman Luke construction: In step 3: Replaced "Draw the circumcircle (tangent to every corner A, B, C, D)" with "Draw the circumcircle of ABCD", because e.g.: angle BAF # angle DAE (unless ABCD is regular: special cases). In step 5: Little phrasing improvement undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

curprev 23:4523:45, 6 July 2021‎ JavBol talk contribs‎ 20,483 bytes +90‎ Rectified, explained, & rephrased last steps of Dorman Luke construction. undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

curprev 22:3922:39, 2 July 2021‎ JavBol talk contribs‎ 20,393 bytes +50‎ Many little homogeneity/simplicity/phrasing/specification/clarity improvements undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

curprev 16:4016:40, 1 July 2021‎ David Eppstein talk contribs‎ 20,343 bytes +115‎ Undid revision 1031436788 by Steelpillow (talk) It is not an incorrect statement. undo Tag: Undo
curprev 16:1816:18, 1 July 2021‎ Steelpillow talk contribs‎ 20,228 bytes −115‎ →‎Topological duality: Delete incorrect statement until a correct form can be agreed, undo Tag: Reverted

curprev 20:5920:59, 30 June 2021‎ JayBeeEll talk contribs‎ 20,343 bytes +5‎ Undid revision 1031291886 by Steelpillow (talk) your latest version actually made no sense: "the dual is a polyhedron, but the dual geometric figure might not be a polyhedron" come on. Also please remember WP:BRD. undo Tag: Undo
curprev 20:3320:33, 30 June 2021‎ Steelpillow talk contribs‎ 20,338 bytes −5‎ →‎Topological duality: realizable not defined either, and the sentence is incorrect anyway as unfaithful realizations are always geometrically possible. undo Tag: Reverted
curprev 19:1819:18, 30 June 2021‎ JayBeeEll talk contribs‎ 20,343 bytes +1‎ →‎Topological duality: I don't think "realizable faithfully" is cleaned up relative to "geometrically" -- it is certainly not defined in the article anywhere undo
curprev 18:2218:22, 30 June 2021‎ Steelpillow talk contribs‎ 20,342 bytes −3‎ →‎Topological duality: clean up terminology undo

curprev 22:0922:09, 29 June 2021‎ JavBol talk contribs‎ 20,345 bytes +89‎ (In top part: Removed my 3 asterisks, & restored the only "under symmetries of the polyhedron" in the text; bluelinked 2 terms.) + Many little presentation/homogeneity/phrasing/specification/clarity improvements undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
curprev 16:3016:30, 29 June 2021‎ David Eppstein talk contribs‎ 20,256 bytes −74‎ Undid revision 1031065812 by JavBol (talk) I don't like the asterisks. If this information is important, it needs to stay in the text. undo Tag: Undo
curprev 16:2116:21, 29 June 2021‎ JavBol talk contribs‎ 20,330 bytes +74‎ In top part: Added 3 * (asterisks), referring to "under symmetries of the polyhedron", at end of definitions of isogonal/isohedral/isotoxal polyhedron; bluelinked 2 terms. + Several little presentation/homogeneity/phrasing/specification/clarity improvements undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

25 January 2024

26 November 2023

29 September 2023

8 October 2022

6 September 2022

23 August 2022

25 April 2022

3 February 2022

6 October 2021

20 September 2021

25 August 2021

24 August 2021

23 August 2021

22 August 2021

21 August 2021

20 August 2021

12 August 2021

3 August 2021

2 August 2021

28 July 2021

12 July 2021

10 July 2021

9 July 2021

8 July 2021

7 July 2021

6 July 2021

2 July 2021

1 July 2021

30 June 2021

29 June 2021