User talk:Pseudo daoist: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 15:09, 7 May 2022

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Pseudo_daoist.

This is Pseudo daoist's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Responses[edit]

If I write a comment on your talk page, please respond there, not here.jonathon (talk) 20:22, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Graphology Talk[edit]

Please put comments about Graphology in this block.jonathon 22:03, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

e-Sword Talk[edit]

Please put comments about e-Sword in this block.jonathon 22:03, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relgiously Orientated Distributions[edit]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pseudo_daoist/Religious_Distros is the current draft for the proposed religiously Orientated Distributions page.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pseudo_daoist/Bible_study_Software is a draft for a page. I didn't know about Bible software when I started my draft.jonathon (talk) 20:22, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notes for New Users[edit]

Deletion Guidelines[edit]

Unofficial guidelines

WP:CONG : Notable churches or congregation
WP:SCHOOL : Notable Schools

jonathon (talk) 21:55, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Everything Else[edit]

If a comment doesn't belong in a category listed above, put it here.jonathon 22:03, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Psychogram for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Psychogram is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Psychogram until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Orange Mike | Talk 14:54, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:E-Sword 9 7 1 screenshot.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:E-Sword 9 7 1 screenshot.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:30, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Pseudo daoist. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA reassessment[edit]

Churches of Christ has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Iskandar323 (talk) 15:09, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 43: / Line 43: @@
 == Everything Else ==
 If a comment doesn't belong in a category listed above, put it here.[[User:Pseudo daoist|jonathon]] 22:03, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
+== Nomination of [[:Psychogram]] for deletion ==
+<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article '''[[:Psychogram]]''' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]].
+The article will be discussed at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Psychogram ]] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
-== Sacred text? ==
-You are going to need to provide [[WP:N|neutral]] [[WP:RS|citations]] to the effect that the text are sacred. Without it - and without achieving consensus in discussion - I am not going to allow what appears to be biased descriptives to be allowed to the article. I am engaged int he discussion. Until its concluded, it would be splendid you could abstain from reverting the word back in. thanks. - [[User:Arcayne|<span style="color:#3B444B">'''Arcayne'''</span>]] [[User talk:Arcayne|<small><span style="color:gray">(<sup>'''cast a spell'''</sup>)</span></small>]] 06:12, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
+Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> [[User:Orangemike|<span style="color:#F80">Orange Mike</span>]] &#124; [[User talk:Orangemike|<span style="color:#FA0">Talk</span>]] 14:54, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
+==Orphaned non-free image File:E-Sword 9 7 1 screenshot.png==
+<span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">'''[[Image:Ambox warning blue.svg|35px|left|⚠|link=]]'''</span> Thanks for uploading '''[[:File:E-Sword 9 7 1 screenshot.png]]'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a [[WP:FU|claim of fair use]]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see [[Wikipedia:Non-free content#Policy|our policy for non-free media]]).
+Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in the [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#F5|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --[[User:B-bot|B-bot]] ([[User talk:B-bot|talk]]) 02:30, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
-== please vote ==
+== [[WP:ACE2015|ArbCom elections are now open!]] ==
-[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ten_Commandments#Consensus_and_unprotection here] [[User:Slrubenstein|Slrubenstein]]   |  [[User talk:Slrubenstein|Talk]] 02:51, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
+{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
-== Graphology 'POV pushing' ==
+<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=691963760 -->
+== ArbCom 2017 election voter message ==
-Hi, I was wondering if you could explain to me what exactly about my [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Graphology&action=historysubmit&diff=384863236&oldid=384444643 moving text] from the end of the lead to the beginning is POV pushing? If it's considered a pseudoscience - which we can happily assume that it is, given the references (and current scientific studies), surely that information should be in the first sentence of the lead - it's rather important! [[User:Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry|Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry]] ([[User talk:Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry|talk]]) 18:55, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
+{{Ivmbox|Hello, Pseudo daoist. Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2017|2017 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
-: The whole article fails NPOV. Barry Beyerstein called it a pseudoscience, purely because he objected to it on moral and ethical grounds. Scientific grounds are irrelevant --- which he grudgingly admits to in his book. More to the point, even his research found that there was some validity to it. That rationale (It is morally and ethically objectionable, and thus it is, by definition, a pseudoscience) is why the current version of the article contains none of the recent (within the last five years) research that supports handwriting analysis. That rational is also why none of the papers that critique the research in the field are cited in the article. Most of the criticism and research is akin to walking into [[McDonald's]] and being upset that they don't have a [[Stutz Blackhawk]] in stock, and then criticizing them for not being a diamond jeweler. [[User:Pseudo daoist|jonathon]] ([[User talk:Pseudo daoist#top|talk]]) 20:11, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
-::That's a reason for fixing the article - or even tagging it - not reverting my edit. If you disagree with it being called pseudoscience, you should be removing the sentence entirely. It seems like you're trying to hide a well-sourced sentence instead. Why do you think said sentence belongs at the end, rather than the beginning, of the lead? [[User:Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry|Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry]] ([[User talk:Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry|talk]]) 20:55, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
+The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
+If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2017/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/400|voting page]]'''. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
+|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
+<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/08&oldid=813407029 -->
+==GA reassessment==
+[[Churches of Christ]] has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Churches of Christ/1|reassessment page]]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. [[User:Iskandar323|Iskandar323]] ([[User talk:Iskandar323|talk]]) 15:09, 7 May 2022 (UTC)