Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JIRC: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m moved Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/JIRC to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JIRC: Move VfD to AfD. |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
*Delete. "We have a lot of articles about unremarkable software projects" isn't an argument for keeping this one. Clear away the lot of them, one at a time. [[User:Wile E. Heresiarch|Wile E. Heresiarch]] 03:14, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC) |
*Delete. "We have a lot of articles about unremarkable software projects" isn't an argument for keeping this one. Clear away the lot of them, one at a time. [[User:Wile E. Heresiarch|Wile E. Heresiarch]] 03:14, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete'''—agree with Wile E. [[User:Postdlf|Postdlf]] 06:03, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC) |
*'''Delete'''—agree with Wile E. [[User:Postdlf|Postdlf]] 06:03, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC) |
||
*Delete - agree with above - [[User:Texture|< |
*Delete - agree with above - [[User:Texture|<span style="color:red;">Tεx</span>]][[User Talk:Texture|<span style="color:blue;">τ</span>]][[User:Texture|<span style="color:red;">urε</span>]] 17:53, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC) |
||
*Keep. It's at least in the top-ten list of most used IRC clients. I've used it when IRCing from somewhere other than home. Perhaps it could use a little NPOV stank put on it, but I see no problem with the article. [[User:DryGrain|DryGrain]] 17:07, 14 Jul 2004 (UTC) |
*Keep. It's at least in the top-ten list of most used IRC clients. I've used it when IRCing from somewhere other than home. Perhaps it could use a little NPOV stank put on it, but I see no problem with the article. [[User:DryGrain|DryGrain]] 17:07, 14 Jul 2004 (UTC) |
||
*Keep. [[User:Lady Lysine Ikinsile|—''Lady Lysiŋe Ikiŋsile'']] | [[User talk:Lady Lysine Ikinsile|Talk]] 17:53, 2004 Jul 14 (UTC) |
*Keep. [[User:Lady Lysine Ikinsile|—''Lady Lysiŋe Ikiŋsile'']] | [[User talk:Lady Lysine Ikinsile|Talk]] 17:53, 2004 Jul 14 (UTC) |
||
Latest revision as of 22:25, 21 May 2022
Article listed on WP:VFD July 11 to July 17 2004, rough consensus was to keep. Discussion:
Is this article-worthy? RickK 23:17, Jul 11, 2004 (UTC)
- It's as article-worthy as any of the other IRC clients there are articles about... Keep. Spectatrix 00:10, 2004 Jul 12 (UTC)
- I agree, although it does seem a little like an advertisement for the client. Or maybe it just needs some clean-up. But other than that, I don't see why you'd delete it. Keep. kmccoy 00:47, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- I cleaned it up a bit, its still a littly "flashy" sounding, although I'm convinced its not just an ad, there are too many disadvantages included. Anyways, i'll give it a keep. —siroχo 03:02, Jul 12, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. "We have a lot of articles about unremarkable software projects" isn't an argument for keeping this one. Clear away the lot of them, one at a time. Wile E. Heresiarch 03:14, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- Delete—agree with Wile E. Postdlf 06:03, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- Delete - agree with above - Tεxτurε 17:53, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. It's at least in the top-ten list of most used IRC clients. I've used it when IRCing from somewhere other than home. Perhaps it could use a little NPOV stank put on it, but I see no problem with the article. DryGrain 17:07, 14 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. —Lady Lysiŋe Ikiŋsile | Talk 17:53, 2004 Jul 14 (UTC)
- Keep --Buster 15:53, Jul 16, 2004 (UTC)
End discussion