Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of space shuttle missions/archive1: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 23:56, 9 February 2023

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was removed by User:Matthewedwards 21:45, 30 October 2008 [1].

List of space shuttle missions[edit]

Notified: Space and Human Spaceflight WikiProjects.

I hadn't planned on nominating this one, but I noticed that it had several {{Unreferenced}} templates, which isn't acceptable in featured content. There are several unsourced sections and the lead needs to be improved. Also, according to the page, the last time any of the main references was accessed was 2005, so this should be updated. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 17:56, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Remove for being under-referenced. --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 04:21, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Remove. The List of ISS spacewalks was removed recently for being under-referenced, and it had far more references than this list does at the time it was removed, and unlike this list, it contained no information that cannot be confirmed. This list is not only barely sourced, but it is also very out of date with regards to the flight statistics, and there is no way to verify the statistics currently given. It also fails nearly every single WP:WIAFL criteria: The lead is not up to MOS standards, the prose is not professional, nor does it flow well, it has no "structure" or sections to guide a reader, it is not visually pleasant, it is unsourced, it does not use proper punctuation, it is not comprehensive (many missions simply say "ISS mission"), and probably has many more MOS issues. Ariel♥Gold 09:15, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Remove for shortage of citations. Would be great to see this brought back up again. Durova^Charge! 20:07, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Remove minimum sources and reference templates doesn't make a very good Featured list. iMatthew (talk) 20:48, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 I hadn't planned on nominating this one, but I noticed that it had several {{Tl|Unreferenced}} templates, which isn't acceptable in featured content. There are several unsourced sections and the lead needs to be improved. Also, according to the page, the last time any of the main references was accessed was 2005, so this should be updated. -- [[User:Scorpion0422|Scorpion]]<sup>[[user talk:Scorpion0422|0422]]</sup> 17:56, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 *'''Remove''' for being under-referenced. --[[User:Slgrandson|Slgrandson]] <small>([[User talk:Slgrandson|How's my]] [[Special:Contributions/Slgrandson|egg-throwing coleslaw?]])</small> 04:21, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
-*'''Remove'''. The [[List of ISS spacewalks]] was removed recently for being under-referenced, and it had far more references than this list does at the time it was removed, and unlike this list, it contained no information that cannot be confirmed. This list is not only barely sourced, but it is also very out of date with regards to the flight statistics, and there is no way to verify the statistics currently given. It also fails nearly every single [[WP:WIAFL]] criteria: The [[WP:LS|lead]] is not up to MOS standards, the prose is not professional, nor does it flow well, it has no "structure" or sections to guide a reader, it is not visually pleasant, it is unsourced, it does not use proper punctuation, it is not comprehensive (many missions simply say "ISS mission"), and probably has many more MOS issues. <small>[[user:ArielGold|<font color="8B00FF">'''Ariel'''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/ArielGold|<font color="F64A8A">♥</font>]][[User_talk:ArielGold|<font color="007FFF">'''Gold'''</font>]]</small> 09:15, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
+*'''Remove'''. The [[List of ISS spacewalks]] was removed recently for being under-referenced, and it had far more references than this list does at the time it was removed, and unlike this list, it contained no information that cannot be confirmed. This list is not only barely sourced, but it is also very out of date with regards to the flight statistics, and there is no way to verify the statistics currently given. It also fails nearly every single [[WP:WIAFL]] criteria: The [[WP:LS|lead]] is not up to MOS standards, the prose is not professional, nor does it flow well, it has no "structure" or sections to guide a reader, it is not visually pleasant, it is unsourced, it does not use proper punctuation, it is not comprehensive (many missions simply say "ISS mission"), and probably has many more MOS issues. <small>[[user:ArielGold|<span style="color:#8B00FF;">'''Ariel'''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/ArielGold|<span style="color:#F64A8A;">♥</span>]][[User_talk:ArielGold|<span style="color:#007FFF;">'''Gold'''</span>]]</small> 09:15, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 *'''Remove''' for shortage of citations.  Would be great to see this brought back up again. [[User:Durova|<span style="font-family:Verdana; color:#009">Durova</span>]]<sup>''[[User talk:Durova|Charge!]]''</sup> 20:07, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 *'''Remove''' minimum sources and reference templates doesn't make a very good Featured list. <span style="font-family: tahoma">'''[[User:iMatthew|<span style="color:#900">iMa<span style="color:#090">tth<span style="color:#4682b4">ew</span>]] ([[User talk:IMatthew|talk]])'''</span> 20:48, 21 October 2008 (UTC)