Robert Catlyn: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Judicial advancement: dmy date structure
m clean up spacing around commas and other punctuation fixes, replaced: ; → ;, p. → , p. (5), ,, p. → , p.
 
(46 intermediate revisions by 29 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|English judge}}
'''Sir Robert Catlyn''' (or '''Catlin''') (died 1574) was an English judge and [[Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales|Chief Justice of the Queen’s Bench]].
{{redirect|Robert Catlin|the footballer|Bob Catlin}}
{{more citations needed|date=September 2015}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=August 2021}}
'''Sir Robert Catlyn''' (died 1574) was an English judge and [[Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales|Chief Justice of the Queen's Bench]].<ref>[[Edward Foss|E. Foss]], ''The Judges of England, with sketches of their Lives'', 9 Vols, Vol. 5 (Longman, Brown, Green, Longmans and Roberts, London 1857), [https://archive.org/stream/judgesofengland05foss#page/470/mode/2up pp. 471–74.]</ref> He should not be confused with his cousin [[Richard Catlyn]], a politician, who died in 1556.<ref>R. Virgoe, 'Catlyn, Richard (by 1520-56), of Norwich and Honingham, Norf. and Serjeants' Inn, London', in S.T. Bindoff (ed.), ''The History of Parliament: the House of Commons 1509-1558'' (Boydell & Brewer, 1982). [http://www.historyofparliamentonline.org/volume/1509-1558/member/catlyn-richard-1520-56 History of Parliament Online]</ref>


==Origins and early career==
==Origins and early career==
The branch of the Catlyn family from which Robert Catlyn was descended was anciently seated at [[Raunds]] in [[Northamptonshire]]. He was born at Thrapstone in that county, and became a member of the [[Middle Temple]], where he was elected reader in autumn, 1547. In October, 1555, he was admitted with six others to the [[serjeant-at-law|degree of the coif]]; and on November 4, in the following year, [[Philip II of Spain|Philip]] and [[Mary I of England|Mary]] appointed him one of their [[serjeant-at-law|serjeants]].
The branch of the Catlyn family from which Robert Catlyn was descended was anciently seated at [[Raunds]] in [[Northamptonshire]].<ref>'Catlyn of Raundes', in W.C. Metcalfe, ''The Visitations of Northamptonshire made in 1564 and 1618-19'' (Mitchell & Hughes, London 1887), pp. 11, and [https://archive.org/stream/visitationsofnor00harvrich#page/76/mode/2up pp. 77–78.]</ref> The ''Northamptonshire Visitation'' of 1564 shows that he was the son of Thomas Catlyn of Leicestershire,<ref>Anna, sister of the Judge, married into the Bickerton family of [[Beeby]], Leicestershire, see J. Fetherston, ''The Visitation of Leicester in the year 1619 taken by William Camden'', Harleian Society Vol. II (London 1870), [https://archive.org/stream/visitationcount09britgoog#page/n191/mode/2up p. 173.]</ref> who was the second son of Thomas Catlyn of Raunds and his wife, an heiress of the Barton family of [[Hargrave, Northamptonshire|Hargrave]]. The Raunds seat remained with the descendants of his uncle Robert Catlyn. He was born at [[Thrapston]] in Northamptonshire, and became a member of the [[Middle Temple]], where he was elected reader in autumn, 1547. In October, 1555, he was admitted with six others to the [[serjeant-at-law|degree of the coif]]; and on 4 November, in the following year, [[Philip II of Spain|Philip]] and [[Mary I of England|Mary]] appointed him one of their [[Queen's Serjeant|Serjeants]].<ref>Foss, ''Judges of England'', Vol. V, [https://archive.org/stream/judgesofengland05foss#page/346/mode/2up p. 347.]</ref>


==Judicial advancement==
==Judicial advancement==
He was raised to the bench as a judge of the [[Court of Common Pleas (England)|Common Pleas]] on 10 October 1558, five weeks before the death of [[Mary I of England|Queen Mary]]; and, like all the other judges, received a new patent the day after the accession of [[Elizabeth I of England|Queen Elizabeth]]. Previous to the following term, on the removal of the two Catholic chief justices, Catlyn was, on 22 January, promoted to the head of the court of [[Queen's Bench|King's Bench]], in the place of [[Edward Saunders (judge)|Sir Edward Saunders]]. He was then knighted, and continued to preside as [[Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales|chief justice]] for the next sixteen years, with a high reputation for wisdom and gravity. That he was bold and independent also is apparent from a letter to [[William Cecil, 1st Baron Burghley|Lord Burleigh]], who had conveyed a message from the queen, complaining of his judgment in a suit in which the [[Robert Dudley, 1st Earl of Leicester|Earl of Leicester]] was a party, wherein he says he "dares not alter the ancient forms of court."
Catlyn was raised to the bench as a judge of the [[Court of Common Pleas (England)|Common Pleas]] on 10 October 1558, five weeks before the death of [[Mary I of England|Queen Mary]]; and, like all the other judges, received a new patent the day after the accession of [[Elizabeth I of England|Queen Elizabeth]]. Previous to the following term, on the removal of the two Catholic chief justices, Catlyn was, on 22 January, promoted to the head of the court of [[Court of King's Bench (England)|King's Bench]], in the place of [[Edward Saunders (judge)|Sir Edward Saunders]]. He was then [[Knight Bachelor|knighted]], and continued to preside as [[Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales|chief justice]] for the next sixteen years, with a high reputation for wisdom and gravity. That he was bold and independent also is apparent from a letter to [[William Cecil, 1st Baron Burghley|Lord Burleigh]], who had conveyed a message from the queen, complaining of his judgment in a suit in which the [[Robert Dudley, 1st Earl of Leicester|Earl of Leicester]] was a party, wherein he says he "dares not alter the ancient forms of court."


==Trial of the Duke of Norfolk==
==Trial of the Duke of Norfolk==
Crown prosecutions seem to have been uncommonly rare during the early years of [[Elizabeth I of England|Elizabeth]]'s reign. While Catlyn was [[Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales|chief justice]], only two are mentioned in the "[[State trials|State Trials]]" and the "Baga de Secretia" adds very few more. The principal one was that of the [[Thomas Howard, 4th Duke of Norfolk|Duke of Norfolk]], in January, 1571, at which all the judges attended. The whole proceedings are minutely detailed from the report, apparently, of "Mr. Thomas Norton, who wrote down the trial on the scaffold," being, it is to be presumed, the "short-hand writer" employed by the crown. The [[Thomas Howard, 4th Duke of Norfolk|duke]] being tried by his peers, neither of the chief justices interfered, except when questions of law were raised, which they decided fairly, according to the acknowledged practice of the times. On pronouncing judgment against Robert Hickford, one of the duke's servants, who pleaded guilty, Chief Justice Catlyn made him a long and eloquent speech on the heinousness of treason, thus happily referring to a passage in [[Geoffrey Chaucer|Chaucer's]] ''House of Fame'' "As for them that seek fame by Treason, and by procuring the destruction of Princes, where shall sound that fame? Shall the golden Trump of Fame and Good Report, that [[Chaucer]] speaketh of? No; but the black Trump of Shame shall blow out their infamy for ever."
Crown prosecutions seem to have been uncommonly rare during the early years of [[Elizabeth I of England|Elizabeth]]'s reign. While Catlyn was [[Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales|chief justice]], only two are mentioned in the "[[State trials|State Trials]]" and the "[[Baga de Secretis]]" adds very few more. The principal one was that of the [[Thomas Howard, 4th Duke of Norfolk|Duke of Norfolk]], in January, 1571, at which all the judges attended.<ref>T. Salmon, ''A complete collection of state-trials, and proceedings for high-treason, and other crimes and misdemeanours: from the reign of King Richard II. to the end of the reign of King George I. With two alphabetical tables to the whole'', 2nd Edition (J. Walthoe sen., etc., London 1730) Vol. 1, pp. 82-120.</ref> The whole proceedings are minutely detailed from the report, apparently, of "Mr. Thomas Norton, who wrote down the trial on the scaffold," being, it is to be presumed, the "short-hand writer" employed by the crown. The [[Thomas Howard, 4th Duke of Norfolk|duke]] being tried by his peers, neither of the chief justices interfered, except when questions of law were raised, which they decided fairly, according to the acknowledged practice of the times. On pronouncing judgment against Robert Hickford, one of the duke's servants, who pleaded guilty, Chief Justice Catlyn made him a long and eloquent speech on the heinousness of treason, thus happily referring to a passage in [[Geoffrey Chaucer|Chaucer's]] ''[[House of Fame]]'' "As for them that seek fame by Treason, and by procuring the destruction of Princes, where shall sound that fame? Shall the golden Trump of Fame and Good Report, that [[Chaucer]] speaketh of? No; but the black Trump of Shame shall blow out their infamy for ever."<ref>'The Trial of Mr Robert Hickford', in T. Salmon, ''State trials'' 1730 Edition, Vol. 1, [https://books.google.com/books?id=vG5UAAAAYAAJ&q=Trump+of+Fame at p. 119.]</ref>


==Reputation==
==Reputation==
However high the character of a judge may be, it is not to be expected that those against whom he decides will always join in his praises. In 1566, one Thomas Welsh of London was indicted in the [[Queen's Bench|King's Bench]] for saying, "My Lord Chief Justice Catlyn is incensed against me, I cannot have justice, nor can be heard ; for that court now is made a court of conscience," and was fined accordingly. [[William Camden|Camden]] relates that on one occasion the chief justice, having taken exception to a man who had two names, saying "no honest man had a double name, and came in with an alias," was somewhat inapplicably asked, "what exception he could take to Jesus Christ, alias Jesus of Nazareth?"
However high the character of a judge may be, it is not to be expected that those against whom he decides will always join in his praises. In 1566, one Thomas Welsh of London was indicted in the [[Court of King's Bench (England)|King's Bench]] for saying, "My Lord Chief Justice Catlyn is incensed against me, I cannot have justice, nor can be heard; for that court now is made a court of conscience," and was fined accordingly. [[William Camden|Camden]] relates that on one occasion the chief justice, having taken exception to a man who had two names, saying "no honest man had a double name, and came in with an alias," was somewhat inapplicably asked, "what exception he could take to Jesus Christ, alias Jesus of Nazareth?"


He was named an [[Executor]] in the will of [[Richard Rich, 1st Baron Rich]], together with William Bourne, [[Gilbert Gerard (judge)|Sir Gilbert Gerard]] and [[Sir William Cordell]], but at probate expressly renounced his executorship.<ref>Will of Sir Richard Ryche Lord Ryche (P.C.C. 1568).</ref>
Chief Justice Catlyn died at his seat at Newenham in [[Bedfordshire]] towards the end of 1574, when he was succeeded by Sir [[Christopher Wray]].

Chief Justice Catlyn died at his seat at Newenham in [[Bedfordshire]] towards the end of 1574, when he was succeeded by Sir [[Christopher Wray (English judge)|Christopher Wray]].


==Family and descendants==
==Family and descendants==
He married Ann, the daughter of John Boles of [[Wallington, Hertfordshire]], and relict of John Burgoyne. By her he left an only daughter, [[Mary Catlin|Mary]], who married first Sir John Spencer, and secondly Sir Robert Fowler. Her son by Sir John Spencer was [[Robert Spencer, 1st Baron Spencer of Wormleighton|Robert]], who was created Baron Spencer of Wormleighton in 1603, and whose grandson [[Henry Spencer, 1st Earl of Sunderland|Henry]] was advanced to the [[Earl of Sunderland|earldom of Sunderland]] in 1643. The [[Charles Spencer, 3rd Duke of Marlborough|fifth earl]] succeeded under the act of parliament as [[Duke of Marlborough (title)|Duke of Marlborough]], his mother being second daughter of the [[John Churchill, 1st Duke of Marlborough|great duke]]. The [[Earl Spencer|earldom of Spencer]] of [[Althorp]] is derived from the same stock, the [[John Spencer, 1st Earl Spencer|first earl]] having been the son of a younger son of the [[Charles Spencer, 3rd Earl of Sunderland|third Earl of Sunderland]].
He married Ann, the daughter of John Boles of [[Wallington, Hertfordshire]], and relict of John Burgoyne.<ref>Thus in Foss, ''Judges of England'' Vol. 5, p. 474, citing H. Chauncy, ''The Historical Antiquities of Hertfordshire'', see 2nd Edition (Griffin, London 1700), Reprint (Mullinger, Bishop's Stortford 1826), Vol. 1, [https://archive.org/stream/historicalantiq03chaugoog#page/n123/mode/2up p. 97.] This marriage does not appear in the ''Visitation of Northamptonshire'' cited above.</ref> By her he left an only daughter, [[Mary Catlin|Mary]], who married first [[John Spencer (died 1600)|Sir John Spencer]], and secondly Sir Robert Fowler. Her son by Sir John Spencer was [[Robert Spencer, 1st Baron Spencer of Wormleighton|Robert]], who was created Baron Spencer of Wormleighton in 1603, from whom came the [[Earl of Sunderland|Earls of Sunderland]] and [[Duke of Marlborough (title)|Dukes of Marlborough]].


==Sources==
{{reflist}}
''This article incorporates text from [[Edward Foss|Foss's]]'' Judges of England, ''a publication now in the public domain.''
''This article incorporates text from [[Edward Foss|Foss's]]'' Judges of England, ''a publication now in the public domain.''
{{Authority control}}


{{Persondata <!-- Metadata: see [[Wikipedia:Persondata]]. -->
| NAME = Catlyn, Robert
| ALTERNATIVE NAMES =
| SHORT DESCRIPTION =
| DATE OF BIRTH =
| PLACE OF BIRTH =
| DATE OF DEATH = 1574
| PLACE OF DEATH =
}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Catlyn, Robert}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Catlyn, Robert}}
[[Category:1574 deaths]]
[[Category:1574 deaths]]
[[Category:Lords Chief Justice of England and Wales]]
[[Category:Lord chief justices of England and Wales]]
[[Category:Justices of the Common Pleas]]
[[Category:Justices of the Common Pleas]]
[[Category:English knights]]
[[Category:English knights]]
[[Category:Year of birth missing]]
[[Category:Year of birth missing]]
[[Category:16th-century English people]]
[[Category:16th-century English judges]]
[[Category:People of the Tudor period]]
[[Category:Serjeants-at-law (England)]]
[[Category:People from Thrapston]]
[[Category:Knights Bachelor]]

Latest revision as of 22:05, 4 September 2023

Sir Robert Catlyn (died 1574) was an English judge and Chief Justice of the Queen's Bench.[1] He should not be confused with his cousin Richard Catlyn, a politician, who died in 1556.[2]

Origins and early career[edit]

The branch of the Catlyn family from which Robert Catlyn was descended was anciently seated at Raunds in Northamptonshire.[3] The Northamptonshire Visitation of 1564 shows that he was the son of Thomas Catlyn of Leicestershire,[4] who was the second son of Thomas Catlyn of Raunds and his wife, an heiress of the Barton family of Hargrave. The Raunds seat remained with the descendants of his uncle Robert Catlyn. He was born at Thrapston in Northamptonshire, and became a member of the Middle Temple, where he was elected reader in autumn, 1547. In October, 1555, he was admitted with six others to the degree of the coif; and on 4 November, in the following year, Philip and Mary appointed him one of their Serjeants.[5]

Judicial advancement[edit]

Catlyn was raised to the bench as a judge of the Common Pleas on 10 October 1558, five weeks before the death of Queen Mary; and, like all the other judges, received a new patent the day after the accession of Queen Elizabeth. Previous to the following term, on the removal of the two Catholic chief justices, Catlyn was, on 22 January, promoted to the head of the court of King's Bench, in the place of Sir Edward Saunders. He was then knighted, and continued to preside as chief justice for the next sixteen years, with a high reputation for wisdom and gravity. That he was bold and independent also is apparent from a letter to Lord Burleigh, who had conveyed a message from the queen, complaining of his judgment in a suit in which the Earl of Leicester was a party, wherein he says he "dares not alter the ancient forms of court."

Trial of the Duke of Norfolk[edit]

Crown prosecutions seem to have been uncommonly rare during the early years of Elizabeth's reign. While Catlyn was chief justice, only two are mentioned in the "State Trials" and the "Baga de Secretis" adds very few more. The principal one was that of the Duke of Norfolk, in January, 1571, at which all the judges attended.[6] The whole proceedings are minutely detailed from the report, apparently, of "Mr. Thomas Norton, who wrote down the trial on the scaffold," being, it is to be presumed, the "short-hand writer" employed by the crown. The duke being tried by his peers, neither of the chief justices interfered, except when questions of law were raised, which they decided fairly, according to the acknowledged practice of the times. On pronouncing judgment against Robert Hickford, one of the duke's servants, who pleaded guilty, Chief Justice Catlyn made him a long and eloquent speech on the heinousness of treason, thus happily referring to a passage in Chaucer's House of Fame – "As for them that seek fame by Treason, and by procuring the destruction of Princes, where shall sound that fame? Shall the golden Trump of Fame and Good Report, that Chaucer speaketh of? No; but the black Trump of Shame shall blow out their infamy for ever."[7]

Reputation[edit]

However high the character of a judge may be, it is not to be expected that those against whom he decides will always join in his praises. In 1566, one Thomas Welsh of London was indicted in the King's Bench for saying, "My Lord Chief Justice Catlyn is incensed against me, I cannot have justice, nor can be heard; for that court now is made a court of conscience," and was fined accordingly. Camden relates that on one occasion the chief justice, having taken exception to a man who had two names, saying "no honest man had a double name, and came in with an alias," was somewhat inapplicably asked, "what exception he could take to Jesus Christ, alias Jesus of Nazareth?"

He was named an Executor in the will of Richard Rich, 1st Baron Rich, together with William Bourne, Sir Gilbert Gerard and Sir William Cordell, but at probate expressly renounced his executorship.[8]

Chief Justice Catlyn died at his seat at Newenham in Bedfordshire towards the end of 1574, when he was succeeded by Sir Christopher Wray.

Family and descendants[edit]

He married Ann, the daughter of John Boles of Wallington, Hertfordshire, and relict of John Burgoyne.[9] By her he left an only daughter, Mary, who married first Sir John Spencer, and secondly Sir Robert Fowler. Her son by Sir John Spencer was Robert, who was created Baron Spencer of Wormleighton in 1603, from whom came the Earls of Sunderland and Dukes of Marlborough.

Sources[edit]

  1. ^ E. Foss, The Judges of England, with sketches of their Lives, 9 Vols, Vol. 5 (Longman, Brown, Green, Longmans and Roberts, London 1857), pp. 471–74.
  2. ^ R. Virgoe, 'Catlyn, Richard (by 1520-56), of Norwich and Honingham, Norf. and Serjeants' Inn, London', in S.T. Bindoff (ed.), The History of Parliament: the House of Commons 1509-1558 (Boydell & Brewer, 1982). History of Parliament Online
  3. ^ 'Catlyn of Raundes', in W.C. Metcalfe, The Visitations of Northamptonshire made in 1564 and 1618-19 (Mitchell & Hughes, London 1887), pp. 11, and pp. 77–78.
  4. ^ Anna, sister of the Judge, married into the Bickerton family of Beeby, Leicestershire, see J. Fetherston, The Visitation of Leicester in the year 1619 taken by William Camden, Harleian Society Vol. II (London 1870), p. 173.
  5. ^ Foss, Judges of England, Vol. V, p. 347.
  6. ^ T. Salmon, A complete collection of state-trials, and proceedings for high-treason, and other crimes and misdemeanours: from the reign of King Richard II. to the end of the reign of King George I. With two alphabetical tables to the whole, 2nd Edition (J. Walthoe sen., etc., London 1730) Vol. 1, pp. 82-120.
  7. ^ 'The Trial of Mr Robert Hickford', in T. Salmon, State trials 1730 Edition, Vol. 1, at p. 119.
  8. ^ Will of Sir Richard Ryche Lord Ryche (P.C.C. 1568).
  9. ^ Thus in Foss, Judges of England Vol. 5, p. 474, citing H. Chauncy, The Historical Antiquities of Hertfordshire, see 2nd Edition (Griffin, London 1700), Reprint (Mullinger, Bishop's Stortford 1826), Vol. 1, p. 97. This marriage does not appear in the Visitation of Northamptonshire cited above.

This article incorporates text from Foss's Judges of England, a publication now in the public domain.