Ray Milland

Welcome!

Hello, Calaka, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! 

Since you seem to be interested in anatomy, could you help with this- Skysmith 13:26, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

• Thank you. You article may need some formatting and wikification (ie. addition to wikilinks) but otherwise fine. I update my missing topics pages one at the time but I'll come back to medicine eventually. Keep up the good work. - Skysmith 10:11, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
  • You've really been busy. Keep up the good work - Skysmith 15:14, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Article creation/editing tips/suggestios:

Re: chronic inflammation

Welcome, congratulations on diving right on in to the missing topics! You did a fine job with creating the article, but there are just a couple of concerns I'd like to bring up. When you create an article, introductory websites make for fine reference sources, but you must take care not to quote them verbatim. Because such text itself may be a creative work covered under copyright, adding it to Wikipedia, where all contributions are released under the GFDL, may constitute copyright infringement. It's best to paraphrase sources in a summary style, that is, try to preserve useful information but not necessarily the exact content. Finally, you can add four tildes (~~~~) to the end of your talk page posts to add a signature and time stamp (like this ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 10:42, 1 April 2007 (UTC)).

Anyway, thank you for contributing and I hope you enjoy editing here! BTW, are you a doctor or medical student? ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 10:42, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Citations

Hey there. Found the Geschwind syndrome article on recent pages and have fixed the references up for you. The code for a reference is <ref>[(url)]</ref>, and the article numbers them automatically. You can also do <ref>[(url) (caption)]</ref> (with a space between the url and the caption), then in the reference list at the bottom they'll come up with captions next to them. To make the reference list show you'll need to put a {{reflist}} tag somewhere in the article, generally under a "references" or "references and external links" header. Hope this helps! - Zeibura S. Kathau ^{(Info | Talk)} 10:32, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Multiple uses of the same reference

Hi there. I saw your request for help in the edit summary to the article you recently created. You can name your references for use later on in the article. Use the wikitext <ref name="Reference Name">http://www.....</ref> for the first use of the reference. The next time you need to refer to that reference, just use the simpler, <ref name="Reference Name" /> wikitext. The backslash at the end of the ref tag is important, don't forget it. If you have more questions, you can read up at Wikipedia:Footnotes. See you around. Sancho 07:40, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Nice job with the well referenced article creation... a rare occurrence it seems. As a matter of style, it will be an improvement to the article if you moved the placement of the footnote tags to be at the end of the sentences, after the punctuation. Wikipedia:Footnotes#Where_to_place_ref_tags describes this well. Sancho 07:44, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Rosselli-Gulienetti syndrome

Hi there - just thought I'd say congrats on a very well-written page. MackSalmon (Talk) 11:39, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Arthrogryposis

Dear Petze! I think you're doing a great job so please feel free to make the redirects. I'm really overwhelmed because of my works on the medicine portal, medicine project and the collaborations. If you don't know how to make one, let me know. NCurse _work 15:36, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Expand Tag Queries

1. Can you help me understand how you are selecting articles for your recent [1] spree of tagging articles with the {{Expand}} tag? Thanks! Sdsds 04:31, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
2. Yes, you need to either mention why on the talk page or on the expansion requests page (preferably both I assume) -- Chsf 10:44, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
3. Re:Leduc County, Alberta: There's a few hundred pages about counies, municipal districts, rural municipalites and regional districts in western Canada, the large majority in stub or start class. For many, there's little to say, as information about the included municipalities (towns, villages, reserves, hamlets) belong to sub-pages. However, specific info can be found and added to the article, if only one knew what to look for, so if you are looking for specific facts, please ask. But placing an {{expand}} tag on top of every stub page just for the sake of it is not helping in any way. --Qyd 14:54, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
4. Hi. Thanks for the message. Well, there is a certain amount of subjectivity in determining when a tag (of any kind) might be necessary, unless it is a clear-cut case (e.g., one-line stubs), but normally, we place a article-wide expansion-request tag (meaning, the one at the top of article, as opposed to expansion requests that are placed only at the top of specific sections — this tag may be used) only when it is a topic clearly underdeveloped. I believe that the biographic article for that actress is not one in that state. There may not be too much to add about that person without resourcing to fancruft, rumors, etc. — I have that article watchlisted precisely to help keep this sort of thing in check. That's not to say that the article is perfect as it is, in fact quite the opposite: there may be quite a lot of room for improvement, but I don't believe that a general expansion request at the top would help us reach this goal; as a matter of fact it could encourage people to write in all kinds of unencyclopedic contents, since it would be expanding the article. For that one, if we had to tag it, it would possibly be a {{cleanup}} tag or some other tag that would appeal to improving the general quality of the article. Expansion tags could be considered for certain sections of it, although again, clean up and other structural improvements would probably be what the article needs in order to improve really, and not so much expansion. That is, of course, my own assessment of the article's situation. Cheers, Redux 21:19, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
5. On my talk page you wrote "feel free to check the other 100?!" Actually, I did check many of them. In some cases I agreed, and in many other cases I had no basis for judgment. Keep up the good work. --orlady 03:20, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Qxz-ads

You aren't using the ads correctly. You are NOT supposed to directly load the pictures. Instead, use the template {{Qxz-ads}}, like this:

Wikipedia ads	file info – show another – #282

--Andrew Hampe ^Talk 15:18, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Fixed it for you. --Andrew Hampe ^Talk 15:25, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

stubsensor award

Hi Petze, thanks for all your help with the stubsensor. :-) I've noticed you've completed a lot of sections and I'd like to offer a small token of appreciation. I hope you enjoy the stubsensor award. Triddle 21:04, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Great Job

Great Job on stub sensor! Jeepday (talk) 13:20, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Your welcome, I am starting a new project Wikipedia:Unreferenced articles drop by and take a look. Jeepday (talk) 02:17, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism related:

Response to your comments

No problem reverting the vandalism on the article. As for warning about this problem, I don't know what to do. To be honest, I am pretty new here and still learning the ropes. That was my first revert! :) --Crohnie 12:45, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Your Welcome

It was the Oompapa sockpuppet and I noticed it in his contribs, we hard to work hard to keep him (or her) away from Wikipedia, your welcome for the revert! Tellyaddict 15:32, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Those troll edits

That troll user left 4 barnstars on my user page and I noticed that the account was only created an hour before. It looked suspicious to me. I then noticed he/she was leaving stars on many other pages. When an admin blocked it as a troll, I figured I should revert all the edits before anyone got attached to the awards. The only reason I got to it so fast was because I had the Anti-Vandal tool monitoring my watchlist (kind of as a test) while I was doing something else. By the way, anyone can give out Barnstars.-- Mufka ^{(user) (talk) (contribs)} 14:57, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Medicine Collaboration of the Month:

NCurse _work 18:56, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

NCurse _work 06:02, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Exam wishes

Good luck with the exams - Skysmith 06:50, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

• Welcome back. I hope the exams went well - Skysmith 09:32, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Anatomy assessment

I've set up a couple just following the existing examples - I could do it now if you'd be prepared to help set up the categories after I change the template. Recoding the template should only take a few minutes, but it might be half an hour or so to get all the categories sorted out. Richard001 06:14, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Okay, check out Template:WikiProject Anatomy - It's set up for assessments now but all the categories the articles will be placed in are ghosts, as is the assessment page. They don't have to be set up immediately, but take a look at other projects to see how they work.

Category:WikiProject Ecology articles for example shows how they are split into two criteria - quality and importance. Each article goes in both categories, and each of them are broken into the various ratings given. The parent category is then placed in the WikiProject's own category. On each page you should add:

{{catmore1|[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Anatomy]]}}

And for individual categories for a given class or importance add a template like this:

{{Cat importance|topic=Anatomy|importance=High}}

They have one template for class and one for importance (seen above).

See also WP:Assessment, and let me know if you need any help. Richard001 07:05, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

No no, what I mean is these need to be placed on the category pages (look for the red links at the bottom of the talk page where you added the assessment). By adding this to the category page and in turn categorizing it (see the other projects for guidance) you can set up the foundations of an assessment scheme. Richard001 08:38, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

You just forgot to categorize the by importance and by quality categories themselves; don't worry, I've done that for you. Thanks for helping me out, now everyone is better off (including you and me!) Richard001 10:40, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Leonardo da Vinci

There is more info about Leonardo's studies of anatomy at Leonardo da Vinci - scientist and inventor. I think that article should be listed as of high importance and the biographical and general article of mid importance perhaps. --Amandajm 06:41, 7 July 2007 (UTC)