User talk:Maddogfilms

Speedy deletion of Just Macbeth!

A tag has been placed on Just Macbeth! requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. -- Mufka ^{(u) (t) (c)} 16:18, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Das Bus

Please do not add anything about the Happy Tree Friends episode. It has nothing to do with The Simpsons episode. CTJF83Talk 08:00, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

October 2008

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Just Macbeth!, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. CTJF83Talk 08:11, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Just Macbeth! has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 08:44, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Just Macbeth! constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. - Unpopular Opinion (talk) 08:47, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Just Macbeth!. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. - Unpopular Opinion (talk) 08:51, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Lego 2009

Please avoid adding the 2009 sets to their respective articles as they are not confirmed officially by the lego group. Add when actually confirmed (Pictures are not a proper source). Like Rock Raiders, its been confirmed. Thanks User ⁵⁰ 11:56, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

No Such Thing As Dragons

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of No Such Thing As Dragons, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.mortalengines.co.uk/home. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:37, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fever Crumb (Character)

The article Fever Crumb (Character) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable fictional character. In addition, this article is a copy of information that already exists in the novel's Fever Crumb pager. There is no justifiable reason for duplicated information.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Truthanado (talk) 23:38, 3 October 2009 (UTC)