Talk:Tottenham Green (ward): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
wikiproject uk geo using AWB |
Iridescent (talk | contribs) m Fixing links to renamed userpage/user talk page using AWB |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProjectBanners|1={{WPUKgeo|class=|importance=Low}}|2={{WPLondon|class=stub|importance=low}}}} |
{{WikiProjectBanners|1={{WPUKgeo|class=|importance=Low}}|2={{WPLondon|class=stub|importance=low}}}} |
||
This page makes a number of very dubious uncited claims - I've not (yet) AfD'd the article as it ''is'' on a genuine albeit not noteworthy area but the whole thing is very iffy. I've deleted some of the more ludicrous irrelevancies ([[Broadwater Farm]] may indeed be in [[Tottenham]] - it is certainly not in Tottenham Green) and incoherences (eg "50% of the population have an ethnic origin" - what do the other 50% have?), but since almost every line currently contains a controversial uncited claim, I ''will'' return to this page and AfD it or redirect to [[Tottenham]] if not improved in a month or so. <font face="verdana"> [[User: |
This page makes a number of very dubious uncited claims - I've not (yet) AfD'd the article as it ''is'' on a genuine albeit not noteworthy area but the whole thing is very iffy. I've deleted some of the more ludicrous irrelevancies ([[Broadwater Farm]] may indeed be in [[Tottenham]] - it is certainly not in Tottenham Green) and incoherences (eg "50% of the population have an ethnic origin" - what do the other 50% have?), but since almost every line currently contains a controversial uncited claim, I ''will'' return to this page and AfD it or redirect to [[Tottenham]] if not improved in a month or so. <font face="verdana"> [[User:Iridescent|<font color="orangered">'''Irides'''</font><font color="darkviolet">'''cent'''</font>]]</font> 20:40, 20 March 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:08, 11 December 2007
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
This page makes a number of very dubious uncited claims - I've not (yet) AfD'd the article as it is on a genuine albeit not noteworthy area but the whole thing is very iffy. I've deleted some of the more ludicrous irrelevancies (Broadwater Farm may indeed be in Tottenham - it is certainly not in Tottenham Green) and incoherences (eg "50% of the population have an ethnic origin" - what do the other 50% have?), but since almost every line currently contains a controversial uncited claim, I will return to this page and AfD it or redirect to Tottenham if not improved in a month or so. Iridescent 20:40, 20 March 2007 (UTC)