Jump to content

Talk:Viking Age: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Tiger: new section
Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Viking Age/Archive 3) (bot
Line 40: Line 40:


The Rurik dynasty's Viking heritage, alluded to here, is a topic of substantial controversy amongst Russian historians. I am not qualified to speak out on the subject but a professional historian of Russia should craft a more nuanced and informed statement on the subject.
The Rurik dynasty's Viking heritage, alluded to here, is a topic of substantial controversy amongst Russian historians. I am not qualified to speak out on the subject but a professional historian of Russia should craft a more nuanced and informed statement on the subject.

== Added Legacy section ==

Hi, and I probably did lots of newbie mistakes, like the font sizes of the subsections (Settlements and English Language). The text in the "Scandinavia" section is also very short ... I was considering including "Genetics" in the Legacy section, but I'm not sure if that is correct.
: PS: I also removed Dorestad from the list of Baltic trading stations.
: PPS: I also streamlined the wording in the leidang passage (under "Technology").
:T [[Special:Contributions/85.166.161.28|85.166.161.28]] ([[User talk:85.166.161.28|talk]]) 09:38, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

:: Hi, the section "Legacy" is tagged as empty; from my POV that is mainly a typographical issue, as the following sections (History of Scandinavia, Colonies, English loanwords from Norse) were originally conceived as sub-headings - i.e. content - of the "Legacy" section, whereas now they appear as independent sections. T [[Special:Contributions/84.208.86.134|84.208.86.134]] ([[User talk:84.208.86.134|talk]]) 01:26, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
::: Hi, alternatively, in order to avoid duplication, the content of the Legacy section could consist of a "See also" type link list, including e.g Viking Art and similar articles. Idk if there is a Viking Portal, or something similar, where one can find all Viking (legacy) related articles. T [[Special:Contributions/84.208.86.134|84.208.86.134]] ([[User talk:84.208.86.134|talk]]) 19:52, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

== Historical backgorund and context ==
What's the difference between the historical background and historical context sections? If they are redundant I suggest to merge them into a single section. [[User:Forich|Forich]] ([[User talk:Forich|talk]]) 17:25, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
: Hi, I'd say that the "Context" section covers what would otherwise be called "image" or "reception", i.e. the status of Vikings in historiography. The "Background" section is a very meagre and school essay-like sketch of some geographical and cultural traits of Scandinavia. It should be expanded, worked into the "reasons for" section or simply eliminated. The third Historic section, "Overview", looks like a "Timeline". T [[Special:Contributions/84.208.86.134|84.208.86.134]] ([[User talk:84.208.86.134|talk]]) 05:13, 15 April 2021 (UTC)


== New findings to re-define years range of the Viking Age ==
== New findings to re-define years range of the Viking Age ==

Revision as of 00:12, 26 February 2022

Template:Vital article

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jjacob10.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 12:25, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Viking heritage of the Rurik dynasty

The Rurik dynasty's Viking heritage, alluded to here, is a topic of substantial controversy amongst Russian historians. I am not qualified to speak out on the subject but a professional historian of Russia should craft a more nuanced and informed statement on the subject.

New findings to re-define years range of the Viking Age

Sciencedirect and other sources have published research on Salme ship burials of Vikings that move initial date back 50-100 more years to year 700-750. — Preceding unsigned comment added by D72 (talk) 09:20, 17 December 2021 (UTC) [reply]

Tiger

Tiger 130.255.245.23 (talk) 18:54, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]