Talk:Maltese tiger: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
added banner |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{WikiProject Cryptozoology|class=B}} |
{{WikiProject Cryptozoology|class=B}} |
||
Messybeast.com has given permission to use the blue tiger (museum specimen) artist impression on http://www.messybeast.com/genetics/mutant-bigcats.html if someone wishes to add it to the maltese tiger article. |
Messybeast.com has given permission to use the blue tiger (museum specimen) artist impression on http://www.messybeast.com/genetics/mutant-bigcats.html if someone wishes to add it to the maltese tiger article. |
||
U SUCK ASS BIG TIME |
|||
:Messybeast would like to be properly attributed as the image owner. It is not a public domain image.[[User:Messybeast|Messybeast]] 17:38, 1 June 2006 (UTC) |
:Messybeast would like to be properly attributed as the image owner. It is not a public domain image.[[User:Messybeast|Messybeast]] 17:38, 1 June 2006 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 13:43, 6 March 2007
Cats Redirect‑class | |||||||
|
Cryptozoology Redirect‑class | |||||||
|
Messybeast.com has given permission to use the blue tiger (museum specimen) artist impression on http://www.messybeast.com/genetics/mutant-bigcats.html if someone wishes to add it to the maltese tiger article. U SUCK ASS BIG TIME
- Messybeast would like to be properly attributed as the image owner. It is not a public domain image.Messybeast 17:38, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
FAct or fiction
This animal has never been captured, why is it presented as fact that this animal exists? -Ravedave 00:47, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
- This is becoming a common problem with articles on cryptids whose existence is dubious. Oftentimes the language is changed to be more neutral but an anonymous user reverts it to imply that the animal actually exists. -- Huysman 20:08, 20 May 2006 (UTC)