User talk:Tropicaljet: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 07:14, 14 March 2007

Haiku article

Just curious, why annexed rather than occupied? - BalthCat 23:29, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Japan annexed Korea by Japan-Korea Annexation Treaty in 1910 without occupation. Japan did not war against Korea. Tropicaljet 15:37, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. - BalthCat 04:13, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do not vandalize the comfort women article please

[[1]] Further vandalism to this or other articles can result in you being banned from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Mackan 18:08, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the evidence you posted on User talk:Phonemonkey - I've had a quick glance, seems interesting but could you please remind me what this evidence is for? cheers Phonemonkey 12:59, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I haven't actually disputed that comfort women were paid (at least some of them), I only disputed your claim that most comfort women were from Japan. If you wish to point out the evidence that some were highly paid that's fine by me. However I've re-phrased the first paragraph of the article and I've explained the edit on the talk page. Thanks Phonemonkey 20:10, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am postulating so grounded in the resarches cited in the artice. They are resuts of their investigations. I am looking for such papers. If you bring those to me, it's welcome. Thanks. Tropicaljet 07:14, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 20:10, 13 March 2007 edit Phonemonkey (talk \| contribs) 1,318 edits →‎Do not vandalize the [[comfort women]] article please ← Previous edit		Revision as of 07:14, 14 March 2007 edit undo Tropicaljet (talk \| contribs) 295 edits →‎Do not vandalize the [[comfort women]] article please Next edit →
Line 12:		Line 12:

	Thanks. I haven't actually disputed that comfort women were paid (at least some of them), I only disputed your claim that most comfort women were from Japan. If you wish to point out the evidence that some were highly paid that's fine by me. However I've re-phrased the first paragraph of the article and I've explained the edit on the talk page. Thanks [[User:Phonemonkey\|Phonemonkey]] 20:10, 13 March 2007 (UTC)		Thanks. I haven't actually disputed that comfort women were paid (at least some of them), I only disputed your claim that most comfort women were from Japan. If you wish to point out the evidence that some were highly paid that's fine by me. However I've re-phrased the first paragraph of the article and I've explained the edit on the talk page. Thanks [[User:Phonemonkey\|Phonemonkey]] 20:10, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

			:I am postulating so grounded in the resarches cited in the artice. They are resuts of their investigations. I am looking for such papers. If you bring those to me, it's welcome. Thanks. [[User:Tropicaljet\|Tropicaljet]] 07:14, 14 March 2007 (UTC)