Jump to content

User talk:MeowMeow69: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted 1 edit by AquariusChica22 identified as vandalism to last revision by MeowMeow69. using TW
m +unsigned
Line 10: Line 10:


==OK==
==OK==
OK...i apologize for making those comments to Pharos. I will also agree with Kuru, i have not been civilized. I know it seems like im being bipolar, but im just trying to be civilized. AND, person who i shall not name, if u delete what i say one more time, i swear u won't be happy.
OK...i apologize for making those comments to Pharos. I will also agree with Kuru, i have not been civilized. I know it seems like im being bipolar, but im just trying to be civilized. AND, person who i shall not name, if u delete what i say one more time, i swear u won't be happy. {{unsigned|MeowMeow69}}

Revision as of 00:52, 17 March 2007

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. This if for your vandalistic edits under this username, as well under NotQuiteEvil555 and anonymously.--Pharos 22:36, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]




Help?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MeowMeow69 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Ok...I have been blocked by Pharos for making a "nonsense" page. While I will agree with this reasoning, i have also appealed to Pharos himself and he has, of yet, failed to respond to my appeals. I have tried to be civilized and i find it unfair to have a 31 hour block for making just one nonsensical page. I do believe i've learned my lesson though and i promise not to make another page like that, although i know you probably won't take my promise seriously. ALSO, he accused me of being on one of my friends usernames and using it as well...which, I HAVE NOT. I'm trying NOT to make new usernames to get around the block because i know that would be bad, but i think he's being unreasonable.

Decline reason:

You appear to have been exposed to the warnings; it's a short block, please use the time to read over our policies. For example, the one on civility. Kuru talk 00:36, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Whoever's reading this, please have a look at User talk:NotQuiteEvil665.--Pharos 00:15, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK

OK...i apologize for making those comments to Pharos. I will also agree with Kuru, i have not been civilized. I know it seems like im being bipolar, but im just trying to be civilized. AND, person who i shall not name, if u delete what i say one more time, i swear u won't be happy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MeowMeow69 (talkcontribs)