Talk:Schecter Guitar Research: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:20, 20 March 2007

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Guitarists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Guitarists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GuitaristsWikipedia:WikiProject GuitaristsTemplate:WikiProject Guitaristsguitarist articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by Guitar equipment task force.

cleanup tag

This page reads like a marketing brochure for the company. I believe it needs the following:

I question the value of such extensive lists of products and users of the guitars. I suggest that the list of users be reduced to only those with a verifiable source.
The founder of the company was Dave Schecter, for whom the company was named, and who is recognized in several books about guitars as an innovative designer. He sold the company in the early 1980s, and I believe it has subsequently changed hands. The incorrect information should be removed, and replaced with citable info. Some explanatory text would be helpful as well.

-Pete 00:25, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think in general this article is poorly written and reads like a fourth grade paper, especially when it gets to the part about the Texan investors. I edited it for readability on Saturday, but my edit only showed up temporarily (?!?!?!??!!). I'm going to redo it. can edits be rejected?! Thel1lyone 00:54, 20 March 2007 (UTC)Andy Abang[reply]

Are you the editor who edited the article anomously? I read through the edits you made and honestly you didn't do much better. Also, even though you said you didn't delete any information, you did. I didn't delete your edits however, because some were good. I did reword some of your edits because when you reworded some of the sentences they lost their original meaning. Also don't reorganize the article because its supposed to be chronological. I personally don't think the article reads like a fourth grader wrote it, you should have seen the article a while back-it was bad. The article is fine and what it really needs is expansion on the different series of guitars. --Leon Sword 01:18, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 01:18, 20 March 2007 edit Leon Sword (talk \| contribs) 2,905 edits reply ← Previous edit		Revision as of 01:20, 20 March 2007 edit undo Leon Sword (talk \| contribs) 2,905 edits updated assessment Next edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{WikiProjectGuitarists\|class=~~stub~~\|attention=\|Guitarist-equipment-task-force=yes}}		{{WikiProjectGuitarists\|class=B\|attention=\|Guitarist-equipment-task-force=yes}}

	== cleanup tag ==		== cleanup tag ==