Talk:Theophilus I of Alexandria: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Start class for Oriental Orthodoxy
needs infobox
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WPBiography|class=start|priority=|living=no}}
{{WPBiography|class=start|priority=|living=no|needs-infobox=yes}}
{{WikiProject Oriental Orthodoxy|class=Start}}
{{WikiProject Oriental Orthodoxy|class=Start|needs-infobox=yes}}


----
----

Revision as of 21:11, 9 April 2007

WikiProject iconBiography Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Note icon
An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.
WikiProject iconOriental Orthodoxy Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Oriental Orthodoxy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on the Oriental Orthodox Church on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

NPOV

The term "pagan" to describe "non-Christian"s is derogatory, it should be replaced with "non-Christian" or other neutral terms. User:-Ril- 13:11, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Pagan is descriptive, not derogatory in the USA, anyway. Many such use the term in self-description. Check your dictionary— Random House does not deem it derogatory. In slang use it could mean non-religious, but that is not how it is used in the article. Non-Christian does not work as a substitute, otherwise Jews and Muslims could be called pagan! Polytheist probably would serve, but is a little less general, and a little more awkward. Pagan works best here.
The Wikipedia article (Paganism) indicates historical uses as frequently derogatory, but also agrees that it is used self-referentially, and used academically to refer to classic Greek and Roman religions, which is the case here. Where offense is not indicated, offense should not be taken. --Blainster 29 June 2005 08:01 (UTC)
The term "pagan" is used in this sense in nearly every article mentioning religions of this time period, and especially in Christianity related articles where the term is usefully used to group non-Christian religions. And, as Blainster mentions, the term has always been used to describe the classical Greek and Roman religions and has only recently, with the advent of modern groups using the term, been described as "derogatory". I am removing the NPOV. QVanillaQ 03:09, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]