Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2101: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Curtmack (talk | contribs)
Line 39: Line 39:
*'''Redirect''' as above. — [[User:RJHall|RJH]] ([[User_talk:RJHall|''talk'']]) 14:58, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
*'''Redirect''' as above. — [[User:RJHall|RJH]] ([[User_talk:RJHall|''talk'']]) 14:58, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' A bit premature to create such articles which merely say #### will be a year." Absolutely pointless. [[User:Edison|Edison]] 15:10, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' A bit premature to create such articles which merely say #### will be a year." Absolutely pointless. [[User:Edison|Edison]] 15:10, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
*'''Revert to redirects''' per all of the above, minus immediately above, and nom. [[User:Curtmack|Curtmack]] of the [[User_talk:Curtmack|Asylum]] 15:50, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:50, 12 April 2007

2101

2101 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

This page is too far in the future to have a page of its own. Only anniversaries on at the moment. Philip Stevens 18:00, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason:

2102 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2103 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2104 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2105 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2106 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2107 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2108 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2109 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2110 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2111 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2112 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2113 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2114 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2115 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2116 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2117 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2118 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2119 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2120 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2121 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2122 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2123 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2124 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2125 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2126 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2127 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2128 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2129 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Keep as redirects Until today most of these articles were redirects to their respective centuries until User:Voortle recreated them. This Afd should also be more properly called Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2123 (second nomination) , since you already proposed all these articles be deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2123. The result was keep/no consensus, with a general trend towards redirecting. Why not just revert to the versions before today? Dina 18:16, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Revert to redirects, as per Dina. No need for AfD mechanics here. SnowFire 18:59, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect all per above. --Czj 20:35, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect as above. — RJH (talk) 14:58, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete A bit premature to create such articles which merely say #### will be a year." Absolutely pointless. Edison 15:10, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Revert to redirects per all of the above, minus immediately above, and nom. Curtmack of the Asylum 15:50, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]