User talk:Luna Santin: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
LAcfm (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{unblock|thanks for blocking 121.45.178.36 now unblock GO KTHX BYE!}}

{{/Header}}
{{/Header}}
<!-- please edit below this mark. thanks! -->
<!-- please edit below this mark. thanks! -->

Revision as of 08:20, 15 April 2007

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Luna Santin (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

thanks for blocking 121.45.178.36 now unblock GO KTHX BYE!

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=thanks for blocking 121.45.178.36 now unblock GO KTHX BYE! |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=thanks for blocking 121.45.178.36 now unblock GO KTHX BYE! |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=thanks for blocking 121.45.178.36 now unblock GO KTHX BYE! |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}


TalkSandboxBlog


  Welcome to my talk page! I'll sometimes reply on your talk, but will frequently (increasingly often) reply here.
When leaving messages, please remember these easy steps:
• Use a ==descriptive heading==
• Use [[wikilinks]] when mentioning users and pages
• Sign your post with four tildes ~~~~ to leave your name and date
If you're new to Wikipedia, please see Welcome to Wikipedia or frequently asked questions.

Click here to leave me a message

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28.

AFI response

Here is the mail from them. I could forward it to Wikipedia if you want


Dear Balaji Viswanathan,

Thank you for contacting AFI. The lists are public domain. You can use them as long as you credit us with the correct title of the list , however you are NOT allowed to use the AFI LOGO. You can say "AFI's 100 Years...100 Thrills" but can't print the actual logo. If you do want to print the logo we need to license it. Thank you for your interest in AFI.


AFI does offer many exclusive benefits through membership, such as unlimited access to the online AFI Catalog of Feature Films, invitations to AFI events and special screenings, film-related magazine subscriptions.

Please visit AFI.com to learn more about the valuable and exciting benefits of membership with AFI!

Thank you for your interest in AFI.

Best Regards,

AFI Web Team


Balajiviswanathan 19:14, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

<_<

>_> – Gurch 23:05, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

<_< – Luna Santin (talk) 22:03, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting

Oh, thanks. Jkelly 01:45, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Of course! – Luna Santin (talk) 01:49, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For continued quick work in AIV! SGGH 10:24, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Re: You called.

Just wanted to share a funny thought.

Wouldn't it be brilliant if everyone's email inbox was like a wiki - then volunteers and admins could delete all the porn senders and rangeblock them :)

Anyhow, Perhaps you could explain what exactly about what I did was helpful, or give me a link to that page again so I can see the backlash. I only threw some fat into the fire - to provoke thought.

Also, Don't suppose you might tell me what a redlinked talk is?

I don't suppose you could also give me some help with setting up a userpage sometime?

Horst.Burkhardt 14:58, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not Luna Santin, but I am bored and looking at this page, so I'll answer you anyway.
A redlinked talk is a discussion page that doesn't exist yet, so it shows up as a red link if you try to link to it. For example, the article Ugthorpe exists, but its discussion page (Talk:Ugthorpe) doesn't. When Luna first saw you editing, you didn't have any messages on your discussion page, so it appeared as a red link. Not having any messages generally means an account is very new, and sadly we often come across new accounts which are simply being used for vandalism, so it's nice to see one doing something useful.
In response to your earlier question about a shared IP address, more or less all IP edits are checked by someone at some point, but if there are too many unconstructive edits coming from one IP address, the only effective way to deal with it is to impose a block. Bear in mind, though, that such blocks don't affect logged-in users; anyone who does wish to edit from that IP merely has to create an account on a computer elsewhere (at home, for example) and then log in when they wish to edit. This isn't too much to ask for someone who has a genuine interest in contributing, but is too much effort for the average bored kid who wishes to mess up a page; besides, we encourage all contributors to create an account, for various reasons.
As for a userpage, just redirect User:Horst.Burkhardt to User talk:Horst.Burkhardt. Userpages are overrated, and Wikipedia is not MySpaceGurch 15:16, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shocker

im not adding nosence to your page, do you know how to create a page so i can make mine own —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shadowperson (talkcontribs) 21:52, 14 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Its true

You reverted what I put in. We kill babies. We see nothing wrong with it. But I do. They sugar-coat it, I reveal it for what it really is, murder. I hope you share the same opinion. I hope you have a sane mind, to see that we are legalizing murder! --66.218.13.32 23:47, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the death threat. There is nothing else to be sorry about. I understand that your a user that is just doing his job.

Now, Wikipedia is not a political battleground. It shouldn't be. If liberals who hate babies would just give in, I wouldn't have to do this. --66.218.13.32 00:09, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Judy Wood

On what rationale did you revert my edit to Judy Wood? I explained why I included the extra information on the talk page, you, on the other hand, provided no explanation of your rationale. Removing legitimate criticism of this thesis from the criticism section of it looks like censorship to me. 124.183.228.151 02:31, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i am sorry luna. i shouldnt have done all that to you. forgive me i am in a state of depression where i just want death. its me, the abortion hater. --66.218.18.33 04:36, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And how do I do this? LAcfm 07:24, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know where, it's like, I'm confused LAcfm 07:27, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do it neccessarily have to look like this? LAcfm