Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/TellyaddictBot: Difference between revisions
Bots welcoming bots |
|||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
<!-- This is not a vote. It is a discussion --> |
<!-- This is not a vote. It is a discussion --> |
||
Hi - sorry to have to be the bearer of bad news, but bots of this type have no community consensus to run - take a look at the first entry at [[Wikipedia:Bots/Frequently denied bots]]. If there is anything special about this bot, which makes you feel that it can be approved despite this, we will gladly consider the proposal. Thanks, <strong>[[User:Martinp23|Mart]]<font color="red">[[User_talk:Martinp23|inp23]]</font></strong> 15:34, 16 April 2007 (UTC) |
Hi - sorry to have to be the bearer of bad news, but bots of this type have no community consensus to run - take a look at the first entry at [[Wikipedia:Bots/Frequently denied bots]]. If there is anything special about this bot, which makes you feel that it can be approved despite this, we will gladly consider the proposal. Thanks, <strong>[[User:Martinp23|Mart]]<font color="red">[[User_talk:Martinp23|inp23]]</font></strong> 15:34, 16 April 2007 (UTC) |
||
:Yes, WelcomeBot is somethign which would never (in my opinion) archive consensus. "Bots welcoming bots" ;-) <i><b>[[User:Snowolf|<font color = "darkmagenta">Snowolf</font>]]<small> <sup>[[User_talk:Snowolf|(talk)]]</sup> <sub>[[WP:CON|CON]]</sub> <sup>[[WP:COI|COI]]</sup></small></b> - </i> 16:12, 16 April 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 16:12, 16 April 2007
Operator: Tellyaddict
Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic, regularly supervised to check all is in order
Programming Language(s):Python, AWB (code not yet written, help appreciated)
Function Summary:(see function details)
Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run):Continuous
Edit rate requested: 8 edits per 1 minute
Already has a bot flag (Y/N):No
Function Details:Welcoing new users using {{User:TellyaddictBot/Welcome}} (which has not yet been created), finding them via Special:Log/Newusers, nothing else apart from this.
Discussion
Hi - sorry to have to be the bearer of bad news, but bots of this type have no community consensus to run - take a look at the first entry at Wikipedia:Bots/Frequently denied bots. If there is anything special about this bot, which makes you feel that it can be approved despite this, we will gladly consider the proposal. Thanks, Martinp23 15:34, 16 April 2007 (UTC)