::"I haven't violated it" - The warning is to prevent you from violating it. "Given your current behaviour, I'd strongly suggest you review this" - To be honest I'd suggest you review [[m:Common sense|this]], you continued to edit war even when two editors had reverted you and I told you it is disputed and shouldn't be added without consensus.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Star_Trek:_The_Next_Generation&diff=124620771&oldid=124620497][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Star_Trek:_The_Next_Generation&diff=124621301&oldid=124620771] [[User:Matthew|Matthew]] 16:19, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
::"I haven't violated it" - The warning is to prevent you from violating it. "Given your current behaviour, I'd strongly suggest you review this" - To be honest I'd suggest you review [[m:Common sense|this]], you continued to edit war even when two editors had reverted you and I told you it is disputed and shouldn't be added without consensus.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Star_Trek:_The_Next_Generation&diff=124620771&oldid=124620497][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Star_Trek:_The_Next_Generation&diff=124621301&oldid=124620771] [[User:Matthew|Matthew]] 16:19, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
:::It saddens me you direct me towards a policy you are obviously not observing. Your reply simply indicates the fact you weren't able to comprehend I know full well the 3RR rule and its interdiction.--[[User:Kamikaze|Kamikaze]] 16:26, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
:::It saddens me you direct me towards a policy you are obviously not observing. Your reply simply indicates the fact you weren't able to comprehend I know full well the 3RR rule and its interdiction.--[[User:Kamikaze|Kamikaze]] 16:26, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
== Promo photos ==
Promo photos are not "free" by our definition. <span style="font-family: Verdana;">[[User:ed_g2s|ed g2s]] • [[User talk:ed_g2s|talk]]</span> 17:25, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
K.
== Come on.. ==
Matthew, you, and myself are simply having a dispute in ST:TNG, and you creating images with side comments attacking another editor are particularly rude. I have no problem with the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Hate_Lost.JPG|image] itself, I personally do not care for Lost, but the comment directed at another editor is very immature, and you did not use any image rationale (it looks like you just copied the copyrighted title card and air brushed it). Anyway, knowing you, you'll remove this comment anyway, so what's the point. Bye <small>Illyria05 ([[User talk:Illyria05|Talk]] <small>•</small> [[Special:Contributions/Illyria05|Contributions]])</small> 19:22, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
==Orphaned fair use image (Image:Hate_Lost.JPG)==
Thanks for uploading '''[[:Image:Hate_Lost.JPG]]'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a [[WP:FU|claim of fair use]]. However, the image is currently [[WP:O|orphaned]], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. [[WP:BOLD|You may add it back]] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see [[Wikipedia:Fair use#Policy|our fair use policy]]).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/{{PAGENAME}}|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> [[User talk:Iamunknown|Iamunknown]] 19:59, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
:It was the lost logo. I believe the production company owns the copyright to that, not you. <span style="font-family: Verdana;">[[User:ed_g2s|ed g2s]] • [[User talk:ed_g2s|talk]]</span> 20:15, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
:You can't take a screenshot and claim copyright on it. The production company owns the copyright to every frame of every episode of Lost, nor can you paint over the top of a copyright image and claim copyright on the new image. It is a [[derivative work]], and still belongs to the original author. <span style="font-family: Verdana;">[[User:ed_g2s|ed g2s]] • [[User talk:ed_g2s|talk]]</span> 20:21, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Kamikaze, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Kamikaze 21:52, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
[reply]
Just a quick note, the image that appears in this userbox is tagged as being licensed as Fair Use, if this is correct, the image cannot be used in userboxes or in any other form out with the article mainspace. If you require any further information, don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Kind Regards - Heligoland | Talk | Contribs 23:59, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Willy sockpuppets
They do exist, see Special:Users, search for anything with "on wheels" and add the WoWsock template. --Malkin-gelbitt 15:24, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I saw their block log. However, I find it strange a newly registered user should be so familiar with these cases of vandalism.--Kamikaze 15:26, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Human Feces Image
Thanks for leaving your comments on my page. Please keep in mind that I can't control what other people may write there. I do agree that most of the commentary is juvenile and unnecessary.
However, before you assume that I added that image to the article simply to amuse myself and/or enjoy the reactions that it seems to generate occasionally (such as yours, i.e. "everybody knows what feces looks like therefore an image is unnecessary"), please take a closer look at the talk page for the article. Your argument has been stated and restated in a variety of forms, and every time the consensus appears to be in favor of leaving the image in the article. Have a look at the most recent RfC for an example.
For the "This user hates Lost" userbox. I will using it ASAP. :) - Bagel7 23:19, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Warning
in regards to your insertion of disputed material to TNG article.
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Thank you. Matthew 15:55, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
"I haven't violated it" - The warning is to prevent you from violating it. "Given your current behaviour, I'd strongly suggest you review this" - To be honest I'd suggest you review this, you continued to edit war even when two editors had reverted you and I told you it is disputed and shouldn't be added without consensus.[1][2]Matthew 16:19, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It saddens me you direct me towards a policy you are obviously not observing. Your reply simply indicates the fact you weren't able to comprehend I know full well the 3RR rule and its interdiction.--Kamikaze 16:26, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
