Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coldspot (Wi-Fi): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:
:::'''Comment''' The difference being that there are [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] for hotspot and television, and I can find nothing for "coldspot". For example, when I look on Google News for "coldspot"[http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=coldspot], all the top results are for a refrigerator company by that name. In fact, if I search for "coldspot wifi", I ''still'' get results for the refrigerator. Even a plain Google search, while it does turn up quite a few sites using the term, doesn't suggest any sources that would count as reliable. [[User:ConMan|Confusing Manifestation]] 00:34, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
:::'''Comment''' The difference being that there are [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] for hotspot and television, and I can find nothing for "coldspot". For example, when I look on Google News for "coldspot"[http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=coldspot], all the top results are for a refrigerator company by that name. In fact, if I search for "coldspot wifi", I ''still'' get results for the refrigerator. Even a plain Google search, while it does turn up quite a few sites using the term, doesn't suggest any sources that would count as reliable. [[User:ConMan|Confusing Manifestation]] 00:34, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
:'''Delete''' per my reasoning above. [[User:ConMan|Confusing Manifestation]] 00:34, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
:'''Delete''' per my reasoning above. [[User:ConMan|Confusing Manifestation]] 00:34, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
:[http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=coldspot a further source]]. [[User:lewisskinner|'''<font color="red">L.J.Skinner'''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:lewisskinner|<font color="green">''wot''</font>]]|[[Special:Contributions/lewisskinner|<font color="blue">''I did''</font>]]</sup> 02:01, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
:[http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=coldspot a further source]. [[User:lewisskinner|'''<font color="red">L.J.Skinner'''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:lewisskinner|<font color="green">''wot''</font>]]|[[Special:Contributions/lewisskinner|<font color="blue">''I did''</font>]]</sup> 02:01, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
:[http://zurich.ai.mit.edu/hypermail/thinkpad/2005-02/0501.html another]. [[User:lewisskinner|'''<font color="red">L.J.Skinner'''</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:lewisskinner|<font color="green">''wot''</font>]]|[[Special:Contributions/lewisskinner|<font color="blue">''I did''</font>]]</sup> 02:03, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:03, 26 April 2007

Coldspot (Wi-Fi)

Coldspot (Wi-Fi) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Unverifiable neologism. SchuminWeb (Talk) 18:22, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • keep. Though I guess I would say that as the article creator! Neologism it may be, that doesn't make the subject unnotable. As suggested in the article, coldspots will be a more valuble subject than hotspots, as there will be a a complete web. We currently talk about mobile phone "no signal areas", so why not Wi-Fi Coldspots? L.J.Skinnerwot|I did 21:42, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Non-notable, uncited (bar hearsay), admitted neoligism, OR, probably vanity entry, crystal-ball-gazing and apparent attempt to circumvent previous deletion decision (so speedy delete). Andy Mabbett 22:43, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Off-topic Pigsonthewing. Please note[1]. The previous page(s) were created and deleted before I was even a member on wiki![2]. Do not throw accusations around without checking your facts. Additionally, every word is a neologism at some point! That's what it means: neo = new, logos = word. L.J.Skinnerwot|I did 23:04, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, Hotspot itself is a neologism, albeit in common useage. As is television, and many other expressions. L.J.Skinnerwot|I did 00:13, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The difference being that there are reliable sources for hotspot and television, and I can find nothing for "coldspot". For example, when I look on Google News for "coldspot"[3], all the top results are for a refrigerator company by that name. In fact, if I search for "coldspot wifi", I still get results for the refrigerator. Even a plain Google search, while it does turn up quite a few sites using the term, doesn't suggest any sources that would count as reliable. Confusing Manifestation 00:34, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per my reasoning above. Confusing Manifestation 00:34, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
a further source. L.J.Skinnerwot|I did 02:01, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
another. L.J.Skinnerwot|I did 02:03, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]