User talk:Superjustinbros.: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SuperDT (talk | contribs)
CTZMSC3 (talk | contribs)
Line 82: Line 82:


Thanks for reminding me :) I got caught up in a couple other things on Wikipedia that I almost forgot...[[User:SuperDT|SuperDT]] 15:08, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for reminding me :) I got caught up in a couple other things on Wikipedia that I almost forgot...[[User:SuperDT|SuperDT]] 15:08, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

== [[RollerCoaster Tycoon (game)]] move ==

I reverted the move. It's better at the original title. <span style="font-family:courier new; text-decoration:underline; background-color:black">[[User:BANG!|<font color="lightgreen">BANG</font>]][[User talk:BANG!|<font color="lightgrey">!</font>]]</span> 21:59, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:59, 29 April 2007

Do not do it again - you WILL be blocked

Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as American Dad vs. Family Guy) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A•N•N•Afoxlover PLEASE SIGN HERE, ANYONE! 20:44, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LOOK, SOMEONE SAID THAT THEY WANTED AN ARTICLE BASED ON THIS. HAVEN'T YOU LOOKED AT THE FAMILY GUY TALK PAGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!???????????????????????? (Superjustinbros. 20:48, 22 February 2007 (UTC))[reply]

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article User:Superjustinbros., suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on [[Talk:User:Superjustinbros.|its talk page]]. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. SVRTVDude (Yell - Toil) 05:59, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the inapropate commont to User:A Man in Black. But i'm kinda still mad at him for deleating my articles.(Superjustinbros. 16:11, 24 February 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Stub sorting

Hello Superjustinbros.,

I noticed you marked an article as a stub using the {{stub}} template. Did you know that there are thousands of stub types that you can use to clarify what type of stub the article is? Properly categorizing stubs is important to the Wikipedia community because it helps various WikiProjects to identify articles that need expansion.

You can view the full list of stub types at WP:STUBS.

If you have questions about stub sorting, don't hesitate to ask! There is a wealth of stub information on the stub sorting WikiProject, and hundreds of stub sorters. Thanks! — jmorgan (talk) 23:26, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I notice that you changed the redirect page Famicom to some text pointing users to Famicom Disk System or NES. However, the page was already redirecting to the same place as NES and it seems to me that anyone typing famicom into the search is probably looking for the famicom itself. The FDS is linked to from the NES article, though, so people will still be able to find it. Because of this, I've reverted the page back to a redirect. If you feel that this isn't right, please feel free to contact me, and we'll discuss it. --Sopoforic 03:35, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Retro Arcade Classics (PC game), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Bmg916 Speak to Me 21:56, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


March 2007

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices, as you did with Retro Arcade Classics (PC game). Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. Bmg916 Speak to Me 21:57, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Page protection

{helpme|How do you portect articles from other people editing them?}

Hello, please see Wikipedia:Protection policy. --KFP (talk | contribs) 20:03, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Reply to your comments on my talk page

Hello, having a good day? I hope you are :) First, in reply to your comment: "You lowered the score of that article just because you made fans of that tamagotchi list get led to the main Tamagotchi article!" What's this score you're talking about? Please enlighten me.

Second: "Look, i'm sorry, but why did you change this article in the first place, Now you made Tamagotchi fans sad... :<( -Sigh-..........-cry- -sob- sniff... you made me sad."

Apology accepted :) I redirected it under WP:NOT, a little bit of WP:OR and a little bite of WP:NOTE, specifically Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate list of information, Wikipedia is not a game guide, and no original research, AKA you didn't cite your sources, therefore it's either: 1) copyvio or 2) Original Research, both of which are not allowed on Wikipedia. Wikipedia: Notability kicks in because while Tamagotchis are notable, the releases are notable, and the video games are notable, the characters are not so much notable. Most people don't really care what the Tamagotchi is called, what its IQ is, its likes and dislikes, etc., they just want a cool-looking Tamagotchi character. Also, I didn't make fans of Tamagotchi sad; I'm a fan of Tamagotchi, and I'm not sad about it. I'm rather exhuberant at the moment :) So I believe the only person that's sad about it is you...

Lastly: "I DISLIKE YOU A LOT FO WHAT YOU DID!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! MEANE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" Well that's not very nice, now is it? You just made me go from exhuberant, to sad :'(

If you'd like, we'd be more than happy if you would contibute to the currently existing articles Tamagotchi and List of Tamagotchi releases. Please reply back whenever it's convienent to you, if you wish. SuperDT 03:38, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Night Light

When moving pages, as you did to Night Light, please remember to fix any double redirects. These can create slow, unpleasant experiences for the reader, waste server resources, and make the navigational structure of the site confusing. Thank you. SmileToday☺(talk to me , My edits) 23:30, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments on FictionH's talkpage.

"I'm watching you..." is not the type of friendly comment we encourage leaving on other users talkpages, in addition, "I don't like it" is not a reason to oppose change - try and find something based in policy. --Fredrick day 21:11, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus regarding screenshots

Superjustinbros., I've started a consensus on Talk:List of SpongeBob SquarePants episodes to decide to whether include other images besides title cards or not. Squirepants101 02:13, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Translating Japaneze to English

Does anyone know hoy to translate Japaneze websites to English? (text only) (Superjustinbros. 21:29, 8 April 2007 (UTC))[reply]

  • Odd place to put such a request, but one can translate Japanese to English with plenty of online tools. Personally, I like Altavista's Babel Fish, which can be found here. It's not perfect, but it's usually good enough to get the point across. -Platypus Man | Talk 18:51, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

wiimoteskins.com

A tag has been placed on Wii Colors & Covers, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dancter 23:53, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your helpme request

You asked: How can I make a great article that no one can delete? Is there anyway to prevent deleating?

You probably should read Wikipedia:Why was my page deleted? and Wikipedia:Your first article, both of which have suggestions that seem to apply in your current situation. Hope that helps! – Luna Santin (talk) 20:42, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
SuperJ, the best way to make a great article that no one can delete is to write a great article that no one would want to delete. There is no way to prevent an administrator from deleting an article that he feels is unencyclopedic. The best you can do is plead your case to save or undelete and article. As others have suggested, you might take a look at What wikipedia is and What wikipedia is not to get a better idea of the scope of this project. Hoof Hearted 20:48, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Reminder

Thanks for reminding me :) I got caught up in a couple other things on Wikipedia that I almost forgot...SuperDT 15:08, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted the move. It's better at the original title. BANG! 21:59, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]