Talk:Borderline (magazine): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 4: Line 4:


there is no link for the magazine is it downloadable magazine ?
there is no link for the magazine is it downloadable magazine ?

i think the site was
i think the site was
http://www.borderlinemagazine.co.uk/
http://www.borderlinemagazine.co.uk/
but doesn't work right now



This magazine was a downloadable magazine which no longer exists and the website from which you could download issues also no longer exists. Some issues can be downloaded from a blog set up by former contributors, the address is in the body of the main article.
but dosn't work right now


==Copy violation?==
==Copy violation?==

Revision as of 13:31, 16 May 2007

WikiProject iconComics Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Link?

there is no link for the magazine is it downloadable magazine ? i think the site was http://www.borderlinemagazine.co.uk/ but doesn't work right now


This magazine was a downloadable magazine which no longer exists and the website from which you could download issues also no longer exists. Some issues can be downloaded from a blog set up by former contributors, the address is in the body of the main article.

Copy violation?

I flagged the page as having Marketspeak but checking the link I see a lot of this is because the key sections (like the opening and closing sections) are lifted verbatim from here. Given the obvious copy violation and the tone of the content I think this needs a radical rewrite. (Emperor 11:38, 18 April 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Both version were written by the same person, so there is no copy violation. If the previous editor - Emperor - believes this needs a radical rewrite he should be aware of just about every other entry for comics magazine on the wikipedia site. Also, it is possible that 'Emperor' has a vested interest in debunking this entry. (User:Allerton