Talk:Borderline (magazine): Difference between revisions
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
there is no link for the magazine is it downloadable magazine ? |
there is no link for the magazine is it downloadable magazine ? |
||
i think the site was |
i think the site was |
||
http://www.borderlinemagazine.co.uk/ |
http://www.borderlinemagazine.co.uk/ |
||
⚫ | |||
This magazine was a downloadable magazine which no longer exists and the website from which you could download issues also no longer exists. Some issues can be downloaded from a blog set up by former contributors, the address is in the body of the main article. |
|||
⚫ | |||
==Copy violation?== |
==Copy violation?== |
Revision as of 13:31, 16 May 2007
Comics Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
Link?
there is no link for the magazine is it downloadable magazine ? i think the site was http://www.borderlinemagazine.co.uk/ but doesn't work right now
This magazine was a downloadable magazine which no longer exists and the website from which you could download issues also no longer exists. Some issues can be downloaded from a blog set up by former contributors, the address is in the body of the main article.
Copy violation?
I flagged the page as having Marketspeak but checking the link I see a lot of this is because the key sections (like the opening and closing sections) are lifted verbatim from here. Given the obvious copy violation and the tone of the content I think this needs a radical rewrite. (Emperor 11:38, 18 April 2007 (UTC))
Both version were written by the same person, so there is no copy violation. If the previous editor - Emperor - believes this needs a radical rewrite he should be aware of just about every other entry for comics magazine on the wikipedia site. Also, it is possible that 'Emperor' has a vested interest in debunking this entry. (User:Allerton