Reflexive relation: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by 75.75.96.19 (talk) to last version by Patrick
reflexive closure, reflexive reduction
Line 10: Line 10:


:<math>\forall a \in X,\ \lnot (a R a)</math>.
:<math>\forall a \in X,\ \lnot (a R a)</math>.

The '''reflexive closure''' ''R''&nbsp;<sup>=</sup> is defined as ''R''&nbsp;<sup>=</sup> = {(''x'', ''x'') | ''x'' ∈ ''X''} ∪ ''R'', i.e., the smallest reflexive relation over ''X'' containing ''R''. This can be seen to be equal to the intersection of all reflexive relations containing ''R''.

The '''reflexive reduction''' of a binary relation R on a set is the irreflexive relation R' with xR'y iff xRy for all x≠y.


'''Note:''' A common misconception is that a relationship is always either reflexive or irreflexive. Irreflexivity is a stronger condition than failure of reflexivity, so a binary relation may be reflexive, irreflexive, or neither. The [[inequality|strict inequalities]] "less than" and "greater than" are irreflexive relations whereas the [[inequality|inequalities]] "less than or equal to" and "greater than or equal to" are reflexive. However, if we define a relation ''R'' on the integers such that ''a R b'' [[iff]] ''a = -b'', then it is neither reflexive nor irreflexive, because 0 is related to itself.
'''Note:''' A common misconception is that a relationship is always either reflexive or irreflexive. Irreflexivity is a stronger condition than failure of reflexivity, so a binary relation may be reflexive, irreflexive, or neither. The [[inequality|strict inequalities]] "less than" and "greater than" are irreflexive relations whereas the [[inequality|inequalities]] "less than or equal to" and "greater than or equal to" are reflexive. However, if we define a relation ''R'' on the integers such that ''a R b'' [[iff]] ''a = -b'', then it is neither reflexive nor irreflexive, because 0 is related to itself.

Revision as of 08:18, 17 May 2007

In set theory, a binary relation can have, among other properties, reflexivity or irreflexivity.

At least in this context, (binary) relation (on X) always means a relation on X×X, or in other words from a set X into itself.

  • A reflexive relation R on set X is one where for all a in X, a is R-related to itself. In mathematical notation, this is:
  • An irreflexive (or aliorelative) relation R is one where for all a in X, a is never R-related to itself. In mathematical notation, this is:
.

The reflexive closure R = is defined as R = = {(x, x) | xX} ∪ R, i.e., the smallest reflexive relation over X containing R. This can be seen to be equal to the intersection of all reflexive relations containing R.

The reflexive reduction of a binary relation R on a set is the irreflexive relation R' with xR'y iff xRy for all x≠y.

Note: A common misconception is that a relationship is always either reflexive or irreflexive. Irreflexivity is a stronger condition than failure of reflexivity, so a binary relation may be reflexive, irreflexive, or neither. The strict inequalities "less than" and "greater than" are irreflexive relations whereas the inequalities "less than or equal to" and "greater than or equal to" are reflexive. However, if we define a relation R on the integers such that a R b iff a = -b, then it is neither reflexive nor irreflexive, because 0 is related to itself.

A transitive irreflexive relation is an asymmetric relation and a strict partial order, while a transitive reflexive relation is only a preorder. Thus on a finite set there are more of the latter than of the former.

Properties containing the reflexive property

Preorder - A reflexive relation that is also transitive. Special cases of preorders such as partial orders and equivalence relations are, therefore, also reflexive.

Examples

Examples of reflexive relations include:

Examples of irreflexive relations include:

  • "is not equal to"
  • "is coprime to"
  • "is greater than":

Number of reflexive relations

Number of n-element binary relations of different types
Elem­ents Any Transitive Reflexive Symmetric Preorder Partial order Total preorder Total order Equivalence relation
0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1
2 16 13 4 8 4 3 3 2 2
3 512 171 64 64 29 19 13 6 5
4 65,536 3,994 4,096 1,024 355 219 75 24 15
n 2n2 2n(n−1) 2n(n+1)/2 n
k=0
k!S(n, k)
n! n
k=0
S(n, k)
OEIS A002416 A006905 A053763 A006125 A000798 A001035 A000670 A000142 A000110

Note that S(n, k) refers to Stirling numbers of the second kind.