Talk:Seismic tomography: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Stemonitis (talk | contribs) remove old {{move}} tag |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{physics|class=|importance=}} |
{{physics|class=|importance=}} |
||
{{WikiProject Geology |
|||
|class=Stub |
|||
|importance= |
|||
|attention= |
|||
|needs-infobox= |
|||
|peer-review= |
|||
|old-peer-review= |
|||
}} |
|||
== Tomography in reflection seismology == |
== Tomography in reflection seismology == |
Revision as of 03:41, 20 May 2007
Physics Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
Geology Stub‑class | ||||||||||
|
Tomography in reflection seismology
Tomographic inversion plays a significant part in depth imaging in the seismic oil exploration industry. This should probably be mentioned briefly. 136.250.232.88 13:45, 12 May 2006 (UTC) Robruss24 13:45, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
Move from "tomography" to "imaging"
I'm requesting this move since tomography is more of a medical term, and is unnecessarily jargon. Imaging is far more intuitive, and is more popular:
Google search | Count |
---|---|
"seismic tomography" | 198,000 |
"seismic imaging" | 260,000 |
Also, I'm starting a new article called Geophysical imaging, showcasing the different geophysical techniques.+mwtoews 23:35, 16 February 2007 (UTC)