Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/William Claiborne/archive1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m →[[William Claiborne]]: sp |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
*'''Comment''' - Unless there is evidence that the 1622 Indian Massacre affected him directly (in which case that should be spelled out) it might be a good idea to remove the picture of all those dead bodies, which is fairly distracting. Do we know whether his town or village was a victim of the attacks? [[User:BenB4|BenB4]] 21:13, 8 July 2007 (UTC) |
*'''Comment''' - Unless there is evidence that the 1622 Indian Massacre affected him directly (in which case that should be spelled out) it might be a good idea to remove the picture of all those dead bodies, which is fairly distracting. Do we know whether his town or village was a victim of the attacks? [[User:BenB4|BenB4]] 21:13, 8 July 2007 (UTC) |
||
:I was using it to try to demonstrate the difficulties of being an early Jamestown colonist. Do you feel it is distracting because it is too small to be readily comprehensible at first glance (and would therefore be acceptable if slightly enlarged) or is its subject matter itself |
:I was using it to try to demonstrate the difficulties of being an early Jamestown colonist. Do you feel it is distracting because it is too small to be readily comprehensible at first glance (and would therefore be acceptable if slightly enlarged) or is its subject matter itself distracting (in which case it would need to be scrapped, I suppose)?[[User:Geraldk|Geraldk]] 21:19, 8 July 2007 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 21:19, 8 July 2007
William Claiborne
Self-nom after peer review and recent GA promotion. Geraldk 19:56, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- Comment - Unless there is evidence that the 1622 Indian Massacre affected him directly (in which case that should be spelled out) it might be a good idea to remove the picture of all those dead bodies, which is fairly distracting. Do we know whether his town or village was a victim of the attacks? BenB4 21:13, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- I was using it to try to demonstrate the difficulties of being an early Jamestown colonist. Do you feel it is distracting because it is too small to be readily comprehensible at first glance (and would therefore be acceptable if slightly enlarged) or is its subject matter itself distracting (in which case it would need to be scrapped, I suppose)?Geraldk 21:19, 8 July 2007 (UTC)