Talk:Abdellah Ouzghar: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:46, 9 July 2007

Suspect translation

"...forgery, uttering a forged document..." Eh?! We don't utter a document. I wonder if "possessing" or "using" are the intended verbs? --Mashford 20:02, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Authoring", maybe? Propaniac 01:50, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry guys, but "uttering a document" is a perfectly legitimate expression. See: [1]. Geo Swan 02:11, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm..not perfectly legitimate. I yield its use specifically in legal contexts, but not in general. Semantic accuracy equates "utter" with "speak", "say" or otherwise strictly verbal expression. However, legality places a subtly different demand on language, which I recognize here by not getting into a bigger fuss. ;-) Mashford 01:46, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 :"Authoring", maybe? [[User:Propaniac|Propaniac]] 01:50, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 ::Sorry guys, but "uttering a document" is a perfectly legitimate expression.  See: [http://www.google.ca/search?q=%22uttering+a+false%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a].  [[User:Geo Swan|Geo Swan]] 02:11, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
+::Hmm..not '''perfectly''' legitimate. I yield its use specifically in legal contexts, but not in general. Semantic accuracy equates "utter" with "speak", "say" or otherwise strictly '''verbal''' expression. However, legality places a subtly different demand on language, which I recognize here by not getting into a bigger fuss. ;-) [[User:Mashford|Mashford]] 01:46, 9 July 2007 (UTC)