User talk:Ursasapien: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 10d) to User talk:Ursasapien/Archive 1, User talk:Ursasapien/Archive 2. |
Ursasapien (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
{{archive box|auto=yes}} |
{{archive box|auto=yes}} |
||
== Canada/Lost == |
|||
Hi there, I'd just like to say thank you for acknowledging that my Canada/Lost paragraph at least has some merit.[[User:Burnside65|Burnside65]] 10:27, August 7, 2007 |
|||
== Social Work page == |
|||
Ursasapien, |
|||
Thank you for your message. I hope to be contributing more to the social work page over the next few weeks. Your contributions have been excellent. I am new to this so it may take you or other to fix up some of my contributions and editing errors. |
|||
I am a social working living in Australia and thought it needed some extra info about us down here. I will endeavour to add more about New Zealand and other issues around social work. |
|||
Thanks. [[User:Jackthecat001]] 21:17, August 7, 2007 |
|||
== Thematic motifs source == |
== Thematic motifs source == |
||
Revision as of 01:01, 28 August 2007
| This is Ursasapien's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 10 days  |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Thematic motifs source
You keep referencing BuddyTV. I looked at the page and do not see what you are referencing on the page. Could you quote it for me? I also started a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Lost a few days ago. --thedemonhog talk • edits 03:10, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- I can't get to the reference now (at work and it is blocked). However, I believe the reference is there to simply verify that "The Lost Experience" was canon. There are other references that talk about the influence of The Stand and The Watchmen on Carlton Cuse and Damon Lindelof. I believe references to the Lost Experience count, as well. On top of this, Qwerty has argued that the primary source (the show itsself) demonstrates this apocalyptic theme. Ursasapien (talk) 03:52, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- It does verify that the Lost Experience is canon, but I don't see how that's relevant. --thedemonhog talk • edits 06:13, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- I am working on an answer to Bignole's bigger question - "Are all of the thematic motifs synthesis or original research?" Nevertheless, the point was made "Lost never specifically mentions the Valenzetti Equation/the end of the world" so, if the Lost Experience = canon, the Valenzetti Equation = canon, therefore end of humanity/end of the world/apocalypse = a thematic motif of Lost. Ursasapien (talk) 06:24, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Hello
Please use the talk page and work towards a compromise rather than blindly reverting things. You do not own that article, the present version DOES contain "some biographical information" despite your assertion to the contrary, and as noted on the talk page the page does need some work. You are hampering consensus by preventing people from working on the article. >Radiant< 10:46, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- You're the one that is not working towards consensus. You have not attempted to achieve it for your changes. Tyrenius 10:56, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Please use the talk page and work towards a compromise rather than blindly reverting things.
- Ditto. Do not blank huge sections of an article without using the talk page and working towards consensus/compromise. Don't use my talk page, use the article's talk page.
- You do not own that article, the present version DOES contain "some biographical information" despite your assertion to the contrary, and as noted on the talk page the page does need some work.
- Again, ditto. YOU do not own the article. You should not blindly continue to push your POV, but rather use your powers of persuasion. The article does need some work, but your blanking of large sections seems to be a pretext to try AfD one more time (and this time, hopefully, get your desired result.
- You are hampering consensus by preventing people from working on the article.
- I most certainly am not! be bold, edit the article, work toward consensus, but don't just blank huge sections with such a vague edit summary.
Sincerely, Ursasapien (talk) 11:11, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Just a caution about your edits to Anna Svidersky, which have reached a maximum reversion limit. Please read the policy page for full information. Tyrenius 11:59, 27 August 2007 (UTC)