User talk:71.157.162.209: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
EVula (talk | contribs)
m Protected User talk:71.157.162.209: {{unblock}} abuse [edit=autoconfirmed:move=autoconfirmed] (expires 08:44, September 1, 2007 (UTC))
NrDg (talk | contribs)
sockpuppet
Line 2: Line 2:


{{unblock reviewed|1=I bet every inch of Miley Cyrus tastes like candy.|decline=continuous disruption (I am considering making the block longer) --[[User:Beetstra|Dirk Beetstra]] <sup>[[User_Talk:Beetstra|<span style="color:#0000FF;">T</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Beetstra|<span style="color:#0000FF;">C</span>]]</sup> 08:01, 31 August 2007 (UTC)}}
{{unblock reviewed|1=I bet every inch of Miley Cyrus tastes like candy.|decline=continuous disruption (I am considering making the block longer) --[[User:Beetstra|Dirk Beetstra]] <sup>[[User_Talk:Beetstra|<span style="color:#0000FF;">T</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Beetstra|<span style="color:#0000FF;">C</span>]]</sup> 08:01, 31 August 2007 (UTC)}}

{{sockpuppet|69.150.85.224|evidence=[[{{highssp|1={{{User|69.150.85.224}}}}}]]}}

Revision as of 03:07, 4 September 2007

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

EVula // talk // // 06:07, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

71.157.162.209 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I bet every inch of Miley Cyrus tastes like candy.

Decline reason:

continuous disruption (I am considering making the block longer) --Dirk Beetstra T C 08:01, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.