User talk:Donny417: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 19:43, 6 September 2007

Welcome, Donny417!

I'm Riana, and I noticed that you're new, so I thought I'd drop you a note. We do have a lot of users, and are currently working on 6,829,484 articles, so things can be a little intimidating... but don't worry! We love to help out, and we'll try our best to make your stay here as comfortable as possible.
Here are a few links I found useful when I first arrived here:- Template:Multicol

Be Bold!
Don't let grumpy users scare you off
Meet other new users
Policies, guidelines, and rules
How to create a page, edit a page and write a great article
A handy tutorial, and a picture tutorial

Template:Multicol-break

Template:Multicol-end You should sign your name on talk pages, discussions and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. Also, if you don't want to jump right into editing articles right now, why not check out the sandbox? Feel free to make test edits there.

I know it's a lot of information, but there are two more things I recommend you take note of while editing Wikipedia - cite references wherever possible, and avoid allowing personal biases interfere with your editing.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian - I definitely do. Although we all make mistakes, please keep in mind what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or problems, leave me a message on my talk page, and I'll try my best to help. Otherwise, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We hope you stick around, and make sure you enjoy yourself! Cheers, – Riana _ऋ 17:13, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Userpages, signatures, etc

Well, you can put anything you want on your userpage, really, as long as it's not offensive, and as long as you're not focusing on your userpage as main activity :) A lot of people write a short paragraph about themselves and have a few userboxes, along with their favourite articles, or articles they've written/helped to write.

As for signatures, if you want something fancy you'll need a little bit of CSS or HTML. So, say you want your signature to look like this: Donny417, you would enter [[User:Donny417|<span style="background:lightblue;color:orange;">'''Donny'''</span>]][[User talk:Donny417|<span style="background:orange;color:lightblue;">417</span>]] into the signature box in your preferences (located on the top right corner). Click 'raw signature' so that the HTML displays correctly, and voila! Help:Wikitext examples and Wikipedia:Cheatsheet are good places to learn about Wikitext. Hope that helps, and feel free to ask more questions. Cheers, – Riana _ऋ 17:13, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Donny417 14:52, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your 3 May 2007 blatant advertising edits to the Billiard ball article

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. By the way, a company's own marketing materials do not qualify as reliable sources for information about that company, its products, or its competitors. Please read the reliable sources, conflict of interest, wikispam, and verifiability policies and guidelines. Furthermore, hostile edit summaries are generally interpreted as disruptive editing. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 06:01, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My revert

Frankly, I fail to see how it is nearly notable enough for inclusion. That said, I've have reverted myself, as my original reason for reverting was that I had misinterpreted your edit as vandalism, having seen only your top edit (adding a peculiar link to Zoophilia). Apologies for any inconvenience. Martinp23 20:11, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE:

First off, that section was a WP:BLP nightmare. Secondly, the sources weren't reliable, and thirdly, making accusatory statements when asking about an edit is likely not to help. –Animum 20:28, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I mean it was a very big infraction of that policy, and if something violates BLP, it is either removed or, if a whole page is an infraction, deleted. –Animum 20:31, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, after a lengthy discussion on IRC, the section was not a BLP vio. However, such a statement that "both men and women are attracted to horses" needs to be sourced with a reliable source, not something from everything2.com. Regards and happy editing! –Animum 20:55, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Userboxes

I suggest using Template:Userboxtop for better structure. Isaac Pankonin 05:07, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Arabian horse

Since this article is very, very thoroughly cited, and since the talk page doesn't show the signs of "other editors challenging the objectiveness of the article" that you claim, and since your claim of "the biased opinions of this specific breed" is nonsensical (horses may well have opinions, but very few of them read Wikipedia), your comment on the talk page of this article is disruptive. Based on your history of disruption in this and other horse-related articles, it was a suggestion that was a very bad idea; if such a review is called for, you should let some editor who has not disrupted the article call for it. Are you planning, in the future, to make well-sourced, neutral, useful contributions to Wikipedia, or are you planning to continue disrupting the encyclopedia? It would save me a lot of trouble if you let me know in advance, so I can go ahead and block you indefinitely if that's what you need. Thanks! -FisherQueen (Talk) 22:05, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]