User talk:Bluemoose/archive2

My talk archive1

---

Deadend sorting

Hi there! You expressed some concern about my miscategorization of dead end pages. While that is indeed true, I feel obliged to point out that the mistakes you've seen are my 'earlier' work. While I was doing that, some people from WP:WSS pointed me to the list of stub templates, and I've made far less mistakes since I've studied that. Before that it was rather easy to get confused between the plethora of tags. Yours, Radiant_* 15:15, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)

button spider

Hi,

I saw your change. "Black widow" equates to "Latrodectus mactans", and I don't think mactans is what they have in southern Africa. Do you know what the species actually is?

I'll have to check things out. It is pretty pointless to call the article "black widow spiders" if we are talking about all the different kinds of "widow spiders" -- all of which seems to be about equally dangerous and otherwise about the same too. P0M 00:51, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

EB2004

I just happened to notice this: Cork Tree (Phellodendron according to EB) is not the same as Cork Oak (Quercus Suber). I'll break the link. Unfortunately some of us say "always look at the EB2004 entry to doublecheck" and others say "never look at the EB2004 entry to guard against unintentional plagiarism"... David Brooks 23:41, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)

User:Humanbot update 08 June 2005

Version two-two released today includes in that green box a nice count of how many articles are left. This more or less co-incides with the event of hitting only 1000 articles remaining. Also, I have re-arranged the User:Humanbot page to make it easier to get to the right stuff. Progress charts, wikicookies, wikilove and a more thorough spelling check is promised when this is completed. (and also when the exam pressure eases off a little on me) r3m0t ^talk 17:40, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC) Note: If you think this message was too trivial for a mailing, tell me and I'll stick to more important announcements on the list.

Thank you for your support

Thank you for your support of my candidacy for adminship. Kelly Martin 15:26, Jun 10, 2005 (UTC)

lots of edits, not an admin

Hi - I made a list of users who've been around long enough to have made lots of edits but aren't admins. If you're at all interested in becoming an admin, can you please add an '*' immediately before your name in this list? I've suggested folks nominating someone might want to puruse this list. Thanks. -- Rick Block (talk) 23:17, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)

User:Humanbot update 13 June 2005

The spelling2 project (to work on secondary namespaces) was opened and finished. Progress charts will be available soon.

Version six-three tracks who made the edits, and rankings are available. Much of the work was done while I was asleep, explaining my low place ;).

The next project, which may even be released today, will probably fix incorrectly capitalised headings, particularly "See Also" and "External Links".

The mailing list has grown to 24 people and while that is very nice for my ego, it is rather difficult to send out updates. This is why I did not send out a notice that the spelling2 project had opened. From now on, then, you must watch User:Humanbot/announce for updates. r3m0t ^talk 12:04, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)

Jack of Diamonds

Sorry, what mistake are you talking about? The page didn't exist until I created it. Gdr 12:57, 2005 Jun 14 (UTC)

I still don't understand what you're trying to tell me. Why was I wrong to create the page? Gdr 13:01, 2005 Jun 14 (UTC)

Let me check this with you: you believe I was wrong to redirect from a topic to an article covering that topic when there were other possible meanings for that topic? If you're right, then how can anyone make any redirects at all?

I note that you yourself made a redirect today from Jacques Grevin to an article on the 16th century author, despite the existence of a television producer with the same name. Was your redirect a mistake too? Gdr 13:27, 2005 Jun 14 (UTC)

Thanks for your support

Hi! thank you for your support for my admin candidacy. I have now been promoted—I hope that you will always feel that I am a responsible administrator. JeremyA 05:17, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Nuttall pages

Can you please not remove the sections on the pages because they really help when doing pruning work so you don't get lost (and they can possibly help for seeing if you want to create an article). If sections have like 2 or 3 in them you can combine them but please don't just remove them. Thanks gren 12:44, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Okay, either way... I'll prune pages that have sections (I do it manually) and you can do the others or something. gren 13:01, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for supporting me on my RfA. It's always nice to get some positive feedback. I hope I can put my new abilities to some good use. -- grm_wnr Esc 17:32, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Sorry

Sorry about that. Though it should disambiguate at least a little bit ;) Dysprosia 09:04, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)