Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EasyScript NoteTaking: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 06:44, 14 September 2007

EasyScript NoteTaking and EasyScript Speed Writing

Both seem rather spammy articles (I note that Easy Script Speed Writing by the same author was speedily deleted). Is the technique notable? -- RHaworth 19:01, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

keep both, merge, cleanup, there is enough references and books published. `'Míkka 19:04, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or cleanup, the two articles read like advertisements. --Izno 06:44, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 19:04, 13 September 2007 edit Altenmann (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 196,776 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 06:44, 14 September 2007 edit undo Izno (talk \| contribs) Administrators 101,680 edits →‎EasyScript NoteTaking and EasyScript Speed Writing Next edit →
Line 8:		Line 8:

	*'''keep both, merge, cleanup''', there is enough references and books published. `'[[user:mikkalai\|Míkka]] 19:04, 13 September 2007 (UTC)		*'''keep both, merge, cleanup''', there is enough references and books published. `'[[user:mikkalai\|Míkka]] 19:04, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
			*'''Delete''' or '''cleanup''', the two articles read like advertisements. --[[User:Izno\|Izno]] 06:44, 14 September 2007 (UTC)