Jump to content

Talk:Foo: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by 67.161.20.226 - ""
Line 23: Line 23:


==ITS A JOKE FOLKS==
==ITS A JOKE FOLKS==
Foo is used in beginning computer science classes as an alternative to variables X or A.
Foo is used in beginning computer science classes as an alternative to variables X or A. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/67.161.20.226|67.161.20.226]] ([[User talk:67.161.20.226|talk]]) 10:09, 4 November 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Revision as of 10:11, 4 November 2007

What about "bin"?

It is always left out of the picture, but it is a big part of the pseudo-variable movement. I mean - come on - it is in Assembly Language Step By Step!

Mrcsparker 15:23, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What about the millitary etymology?

Shouldn't this be mentioned? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Grimboy (talkcontribs) 16:32, 10 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Am I correct in assuming that foo actually stood for "Function, object oriented" or does it precede OO? Mishlai 07:22, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's a backronym, foo's use as a metasyntactic variable precedes OO.

Is this important enough?

Hmmm, does this really deserve its own article? Or should it maybe just be made of Metasyntactic variable? If people think that it should remain... then is it possible to expand on this article? --DFRussia 02:32, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Foo

i use this as a slang to refer to other people similar to dude should that be added here —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.225.112.39 (talk) 22:02, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


ITS A JOKE FOLKS

Foo is used in beginning computer science classes as an alternative to variables X or A. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.161.20.226 (talk) 10:09, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]