User talk:Eurocopter: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 18:58, 6 November 2007

Questions, requests, criticism, and any other comments are welcome! It's also a pleasure for me to help new users.

Archives

Your comments are invited on a proposal at WP:MILAIR

As an editor who has been active in working on air force-related articles, I’d appreciate your input on a a proposed generic structure for "XYZ Air Force" articles. I’d like to get broader inputs and would appreciate your suggestions on improving the proposal. Thanks, Askari Mark (Talk) 20:08, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XX (October 2007)

The October 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 13:56, 3 November 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Standardisation of intros for fighter aircraft

I have been standardizing intros for fighter aircraft, and you have reverted my edits more than once for no valid reason! Please double-check when reverting to make sure that useful parts of the edit are not reverted. If you disagree with a single change and not the other changes in an edit, please only revert that individual change. Bletent reverting waists hours of valuable editing... HyeProfile 20:55, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just a moment, who made that "standard"? Me and User:Fnlayson decided that would be good if we put the NATO reporting name at the end of the lead. And you just came and mentioned the NATO reporting name again, but at the start of the lead. So, what would be the point for mentioning the NATO reporting name twice in the same 5-row lead?? --Eurocopter tigre 21:01, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Soviet occupation of Romania

There is nazi propaganda as well as soviet propaganda. What's the difference between them? --Mr. Diegos 18:52, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you're correct, but to avoid conflicts with other users we should maintain a perfect neutrality. --Eurocopter tigre 18:54, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now you see.--Mr. Diegos 18:58, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 18:55, 6 November 2007 edit Eurocopter (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 13,381 edits m m ← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:58, 6 November 2007 edit undo Mr. Diegos (talk \| contribs) 36 edits →‎Soviet occupation of Romania Next edit →
Line 28:		Line 28:

	:Yes, you're correct, but to avoid conflicts with other users we should maintain a perfect neutrality. --[[User:Eurocopter tigre\|Eurocopter tigre]] 18:54, 6 November 2007 (UTC)		:Yes, you're correct, but to avoid conflicts with other users we should maintain a perfect neutrality. --[[User:Eurocopter tigre\|Eurocopter tigre]] 18:54, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

			Now you see.--[[User:Mr. Diegos\|Mr. Diegos]] 18:58, 6 November 2007 (UTC)