Talk:Caroline Elkins: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by 84.68.53.136 - "→Content, not more one-liners critical of the subject: " |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Editors please use this page to discuss controversies about the Caroline Elkins' views and not engage in a revert war. |
Editors please use this page to discuss controversies about the Caroline Elkins' views and not engage in a revert war. |
||
Elkins will not respond to her many critics, so how can a proper debate happen? |
Elkins will not respond to her many critics, so how can a proper debate happen? <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/84.68.53.136|84.68.53.136]] ([[User talk:84.68.53.136|talk]]) 06:18, 11 November 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
Revision as of 06:19, 11 November 2007
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | Biography Start‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
Editors please use this page to discuss controversies about the Caroline Elkins' views and not engage in a revert war.
Elkins will not respond to her many critics, so how can a proper debate happen? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.68.53.136 (talk) 06:18, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Content, not more one-liners critical of the subject
The 'Criticism of Elkins' work' section is becoming a collection of one-liners critical of Elkins' work and links to adverse reviews. Any author and book have reviewers praising them and panning them. Please let us try and not use these sections to provide a list positive and negative reviews. IMO, there is currently adequate information provided in this section to show that there is both positive and negative press surrounding Elkins' work.
Could we, instead, have more content about the Subject, please? -- Thaths 19:16, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- Is that you, Caroline? 63.215.27.199 19:52, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- The criticism section is poor. The cliams of Elkins' critics are simply repeated near-verbatim. I'd like to see some balance. -- This unsigned comment was made by Hythlodayeus