User talk:99.130.34.227: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:46, 11 January 2008

January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Feminism appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Child support appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. DanielEng (talk) 01:25, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Oyster guitarist 01:43, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to child support. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Slp1 (talk) 01:43, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your message

Sorry if you don't agree with Wiki policy, but your edits to child support violate both WP:NPOV and WP:PROVEIT. The idea that child support is a feminist, Marxist action is not supported by any mainstream analysis, and unless you can provide reliable, neutral sources, it will continue to be reverted. You might also want a read of WP:CIVIL, and remember that reverting the same article more than three times a day will get you blocked. DanielEng (talk) 01:46, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 {{{icon|[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] }}}Please do not add commentary or your own [[Wikipedia:No original research|personal analysis]] to Wikipedia articles{{{{{subst|}}}#if:child support|, as you did to [[:child support]]}}. Doing so violates Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view policy]] and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-npov2 --> [[User:Slp1|Slp1]] ([[User talk:Slp1|talk]]) 01:43, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 :''If this is a shared [[IP address]], and you didn't make the edit, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|creating an account]] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''
+==Your message==
+Sorry if you don't agree with Wiki policy, but your edits to [[child support]] violate both [[WP:NPOV]] and [[WP:PROVEIT]]. The idea that child support is a feminist, Marxist action is not supported by any mainstream analysis, and unless you can provide reliable, neutral sources, it will continue to be reverted. You might also want a read of [[WP:CIVIL]], and remember that reverting the same article more than three times a day will get you blocked. [[User:DanielEng|DanielEng]] ([[User talk:DanielEng|talk]]) 01:46, 11 January 2008 (UTC)