|
Start new topics at the bottom, click here
Avinesh,
Why are you deleting wikipedia articles? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.225.220.11 (talk) 03:19, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I think you are talking about Kolath article. The reason is there in the deletion review. Hope this ok, If you need more information, leave me a message here. Thanks. --Avinesh Jose T 04:21, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
We provide legal TV programs - short films, documentaries, music albums etc - through internet. Flash is the common medium used by most streaming sites.
What you called "ONE CLIP", is actually a full program - not a short clip. If you wait for the full file to play, you will see the following program, and so on - just like regular tv.
On the other hand, if you want to browse the file list for one day, please go to malayalaminternettv.com - where you will be able to choose and play what you like. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jagathkris (talk • contribs) 04:12, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- If it is internet TV, it should have all features like breaking news, entertainment programs, live programs etc. I’ve checked the TV site. It is all created flash movie clips. Drishyam TV claims that it is live programs broadcasted. It is not true. If the site is under construction, let it build up further so that in future we could re-create the article deleted. Not now. Check other internet tv i.e Manorama news, Asianet news etc and see how they have made it. Hope this ok. Thanks. --Avinesh Jose T 04:35, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
z —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jagathkris (talk • contribs) 16:34, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Avineshjose, I find that you have nominated certain articles for deletion based on notability. The reason why articles have been made for Kiriyathil Nair and Kaimal, etc. is because otherwise the length of the article for Nair will become too long. It is the same reason why articles on Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Haryana, Karnataka, etc. are not all packed into the India article. Secondly, the articles refer to sub-sects of society that have a sizeable percentage of the population associated with it, and therefore they are encyclopedia worthy. What we can do is try to add more contributions to the stub articles rather than deleting them (which I believe is not Wikipedia policy).Jammedfly (talk) 05:58, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I nominated it because three users reported it as unreferenced and supported for AfD. --Avinesh Jose T 06:02, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- There are references. I believe there is no case for deleting those articles. However, articles like Kolath, based on a family history, may be deleted if external references (i.e. not from the family website) cannot be foundJammedfly (talk) 06:07, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Let us wait and reach a consensus by discussing it. Thanks. --Avinesh Jose T 06:10, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
e —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jagathkris (talk • contribs) 14:49, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know where you are reading words like "LIVE" - which we didn't use and where you get the notion a tv channel should show everything. There are movie channels that show movies only - with no breaking news. There are music channels that show recorded programs only.
Furthermore, the site is not under construction - it is a fully working site. We don't have to follow in the footsteps of the sites or channels you are familiar with. This is our business, and we have our own business plan.
This WIKI is a public forum, and you don't have the right to be a dictator here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jagathkris (talk • contribs) 15:01, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
a
|
