User talk:Sesshomaru/Archive 9

Kenshin

Do you think that the article may require another image?(Tintor • contribs) 9:31, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Ok, reworded. Do you think that length of the top is ok?(Tintor • contribs) 15:18, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Ah, about of the design, Watsuki made Kenshin the opposite of Seijuro Hiko, not the real hitokiri.Tinto2 contribs 15:18, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

About "complained" you can replace it (no idea what word). About Them Anime Reviews it was italisised in the sasuke and sakura articles and passed GA, no idea if its neccesary, I also italisised Animeondvd. About the desings JadziaLover told he/she was a bit busy but soon will explain the details of the design.Tinto2 contribs 16:00, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

I changed that because that review was too long and I changed it for the most critical info. You can add the other info if you want.Tinto2 contribs 20:30, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Yes, its better now. I noted that you edited another link to those yaminobu in background.Tintor2 contribs 20:44, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

I found info about a character from Buso Renkin that Watsuki comments he designed her with the face of Battosai. Where would that go? Reception or other media?Tintor2 contribs 12:24, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Since Kenshin is a human and his appearance doesnt change in the series until the end it may not be neccesary.Tintor2 contribs 15:54, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

No idea, notojutsu is supposed to be opposite of battojutsu, if battojutsu capitalized maybe notojutsu should also be, (about shinsoku, yes it should).Tintor2 contribs 16:12, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Ok.Tintor2 contribs 16:17, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

But should battojutsu be capitalized?.Tintor2 contribs 16:17, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

But the others yes?.Tintor2 contribs 16:23, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

I have capitalized all with the exception of battojutsu.Tintor2 contribs 16:33, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

About Rurouni Kenshin article, could you tell how should it be organized?.Tintor2 contribs 15:25, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

I have one describing the vacuum of the amaka and the 2nd hit at the same time. Im thinking in using that since its the most fictional and important technique of Kenshin. So? Ok?Tintor2 contribs 20:34, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, the ones I was thinking were two that I combined. There is also a picture with a large number of Hitenmitsurugi techniques but no victims. The one of the amaka(long...) has a victim.Tintor2 contribs 20:53, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Kenshin uses lots of hiten mitsurugi techniques. Amakakeru ryu no hirameki is the most notable of all of them and also the most fictional. So should I add a picture about it?.Tintor2 contribs 21:36, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

If you can reword it, do it.Tintor2 contribs 9:03, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

No idea, the GA nominations are normally slow? It was 10 days ago it was nominated. Well, if Jadzialover doesnt answer me Ill ask to another user about the images of the designs. Maybe that image of "Kenshin in his Battosai state" is not helping too much, since it looks only dark because it was at night and in that moment Saito said "is he battosai now? or he is just angry?". Well, see you.Tintor2 contribs 9:03, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

The point is that in the Battosai state there are no physical changes, he only becomes angrier enough to use all his strength resulting in the death of the opponent. Apart from that I found one image showing a better design of Kenshin in the OVAs. Ill upload it and show it to you decide.Tintor2 contribs 20:56, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Ok here it is [1], if you think it should replace the other one I can cut it.Tintor2 contribs 21:02, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Yes, in the OVAs. You decide, if you want I can cut it and reupload it.Tintor2 contribs 00:07, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

I can cut it to delete the back.Tintor2 contribs 00:16, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

I have found information in a tankobon saying that watsuki created kenshins moves in based to a swordman called matsubayabshi henyasai. There is no article about that, so should I edit a link? It would look red.Tintor2 contribs 00:39, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Naruto links reverted

Hi, and thanks for telling me those links i made were reverted. I am mentally smacking myself in the face for not noticing that the same links were already in the article about a paragraph before where i put them. (**sitting at computer feeling stupid) Anyway, thanks for telling me and undoing my mistake. Ichliebezuko (talk) 19:29, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:Link

No problem. I'm afraid I'm not entirely sure what you're referring to with the dates. Axem Titanium (talk) 03:36, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

I see it. I don't see any reason why it shouldn't be wikilinked. Go ahead. Axem Titanium (talk) 04:00, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

His flying ability is not really central to his character in the way that it is for, say, Superman. Neither is his teleportation skill, for that matter. Use your discretion but know that I may forget this discussion in the future and remove those categories again. Axem Titanium (talk) 05:07, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

I'll take a look and see what needs doing. Axem Titanium (talk) 23:59, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

I explained my reasoning on the talk page. I'm still not sure about the teleport/flying thing so I left it alone for now. Do you recall any notable instances of his use of these abilities? Axem Titanium (talk) 02:25, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Someone else removed teleport. I guess it's a moot point now (I'm not familiar with the TV series). Axem Titanium (talk) 03:01, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

I don't know. I find it helpful to think of it in terms of usefulness. Would a person searching the category "fictional characters who can fly" be confused if Ganon were missing? I would say no since he's not entirely notable for flying. Same with martial artist (although the SSB series is technically non-canon, as well). Axem Titanium (talk) 03:16, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

I guess the categorization issue is fine now. Hopefully, centenarians will stay off and demons is still a bit iffy. Other than that, I personally am fine with things as they are. Axem Titanium (talk) 20:55, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: Kazu

The messages are there; he'll respond when he has time, I'm sure. He's probably just busy with real-life stuff. I know I am. x_x --Masamage ♫ 16:15, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Aww, a post about me; I'm flattered lol. No, seriously, I've been busy so I was doing only minor edits during breaks. Rearding the category... Yes, I should remove it from any articles that don't follow the criteria. I'm gonna do it tomorrow if I have some time, otherwise it'll have to wait till weekend. Kazu-kun (talk) 04:40, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:User name

Thank you very much, Sesshomaru boy (I suppose you watch Yu-Gi-Oh). Anyway, I need to change my name on the other WikiProjects I am a part of, thanks for reminding me. Cheers. Maximillion Pegasus (talk) 13:37, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Did you used to, or still do, contribute to other wikis? Maximillion Pegasus (talk) 20:21, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

How did you know my old user name is registered on Simple English? Just curious, thats all. I am going to do a rename when I get the chance. Do you mean the wikia Dragon Ball wiki? Maximillion Pegasus (talk) 20:30, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh, ok. For my name sake see, Maximillion Pegasus, if you did not get my comment I made, Maximillion has a tendency to put "boy" after peoples names. Would you know anyone interested in a cards wiki? Maximillion Pegasus (talk) 20:44, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, I have obsessed over series in the past, but like you said, I was a kid then. Now, the only thing I obsess with is Wikipedia, Commons, and Wikia, maybe I should get a life. Anyway, the only reason I chose this name besides liking it, is, Maximillion is one of my favorite anime characters. I don't see the point in obsessing over it either. Maximillion Pegasus (talk) 20:58, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Creatures of Terabithia

Thanks for all your help before, I have a favor to ask, can you look at my article Creatures of Terabithia and see if it meets wikipedia standards, thanks Wikizeta (talk) 20:48, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Ok, thanks, i'm doing well, how have you been? Wikizeta (talk) 20:59, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

That's good to hear Wikizeta (talk) 21:13, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

WT:RFR

Hiya. Look, I'm sorry; I appreciate you mean well but I've undone your edit again [2]. Please bear in mind that in a lot of countries outside the US dates are expressed a different way. e.g. 10/12/08 in the US may be the 12th of October but in the UK it would be the 10th of December. It's a minor matter after all, but better IMHO to avoid any ambiguity and to use the full Monthh / Date here. Pedro :  Chat  22:06, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: popups

Re your message: I think it does, though I've never used that feature. Try setting the popupFixDabs option to true. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:03, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Re your message: It appears that you are using the Gadgets version of popups. Add

popupFixDabs=true;

to your monobook.js. Then reload the monobook.js to see if that takes and the available options change. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:08, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Re your message: You can follow the directions on the top of the popups page to install it by either adding it to your monobook.js or checking the Navigation Popups under My Preferences/Gadgets. Either way, you need to add in the bit that I listed above to your monobook.js. So, for example, if you went with a complete monobook.js install, you would have in there:

importScript('User:AzaToth/twinkle.js');
importScript('User:Lupin/popups.js');
popupFixDabs=true;

If you went with the Gadgets method, you would drop the second line. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:24, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Re your messages: If you are at your monobook.js page (not editing, just viewing), then the reload should work. If you reload and then visit a page, popups should be there for any link if you hover over it. I haven't used Twinkle, so I can't help you there. You only need the three lines in your monobook.js that I listed above. The first line is Twinkle, the second is popups, and the third is the extra options for popups. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:42, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Re your messages: Okay, I figured it out. About your first message, you don't need Java to run popups or Twinkle, just JavaScript enabled on your web browser, which most users have enabled. I checked the disambiguate fixing function with popups and I understand how they work now. What I listed above and what you currently have in your monobook.js should work. What happens is that if you float your cursor over this link Syndication, which is a disambiguation page, you will see a bunch of green links at the bottom of the popup menu. You select one of those and it will automatically make the link. However, if you already have a piped link like syndication, you can not edit the piped link through popups. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:23, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Re your message: popups works with IE7. To clear your browser cache under IE7, you select Tools/Internet Options/General/Browsing history Delete.../Delete files.... That will delete your browser cache. You only need to do this when you change your monobook.js file, you don't need to keep doing it to use popups or Twinkle. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:24, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Re your messages: I'm glad you got it to work. The popupFixRedirs option allows you to fix redirects as explained at Wikipedia:Tools/Navigation popups/About fixing redirects. The other tool finds redirects, but you can also use the "What links here" link in the toolbox, though that could be a more manually intensive task. I'm not really sure what you are asking about with redirects. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:40, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Naruto genres

Honestly wouldn't know. Not a good judge for that. Anyway, there doesn't always have to be the maximum. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 07:42, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

The Aang Article Needs You...

... to please help out and vote your support at the Wikipedia:Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive. I really would appreciate it if you voted in support of the article and notify others because it would be convenient if the article got the attention of more editors. Thanks a lot. And here's a smile just to show you how much I need your vote.

Parent5446^{(Murder me for my actions)} has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Parent5446^{(Murder me for my actions)} 22:05, 15 February 2008 (UTC)