Template talk:Scientology: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Revision as of 06:27, 4 March 2008

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Scientology template.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1: 30 days

Scientology Template‑class High‑importance

	This template is supported by WikiProject Scientology, a collaborative effort to help develop and improve Wikipedia's coverage of Scientology. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on Scientology-related topics. See WikiProject Scientology and Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ.ScientologyWikipedia:WikiProject ScientologyTemplate:WikiProject ScientologyScientology articles
Template	This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This template has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by when more than 1 section is present.

Removing alphabetization?

Why did you replace the alphabetizing I did? --GoodDamon 20:48, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, my apologies, but if you looked at your version, it was actually out of alphabetical order. Plus, I thought it only fair to change "Doctrine" and make it "Beliefs and practices", so that it would appear above "Controversies" in alphabetical order, and be more of an NPOV order as well. Is that okay? Cirt 20:51, 30 October 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Sure, that's fine, but I alphabetized the individual sections. Take a look at my edit again. For instance, in the section "Practices" I had it like this: Assists · Auditing · Comm Evs · Disconnection · E-meter · Holidays · Marriage · Rundowns · Silent birth · Study Tech —Preceding unsigned comment added by GoodDamon (talk • contribs) 21:15, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I'm sorry about that. I'll try to go back into your edit, and copy the alphabetized entries within those groups, into this format. Hope that works out. Cirt 21:25, 30 October 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Done - Everything should be in alphabetical order now, by group in the footer, and by entry in each group. Cirt 21:33, 30 October 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Critics

I would suggest putting the link "Category:Critics_of_Scientology" under the "People" section. I think it would also be helpful to separate out the category "Critics" instead of having the critics under the "People" section.T g7 (talk) 21:52, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You really think that's a good idea? We have a lot of sub-sects in the template as is... Cirt (talk) 21:58, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Correction: sorry, instead of "People" I should have said "Controversy". For me personally I want quick access to all the articles on critics of scientology, so I can read all the criticisms, and I think this would be helpful to others too. Thanks. T g7 (talk) 22:15, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Think about the counterpoint, though. Play devil's advocate to yourself and ask what the neutral way would be? Cirt (talk) 22:20, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]