Talk:Carol Barnes: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 16: Line 16:


:Not BLP any more but still and all if there is any doubt let us err on the side of caution. Thanks, [[User:SqueakBox|SqueakBox]] 22:16, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
:Not BLP any more but still and all if there is any doubt let us err on the side of caution. Thanks, [[User:SqueakBox|SqueakBox]] 22:16, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

OK I hear you. I guess it'll get mentioned in the forthcoming obits and then we'll get an additional source. Thanks for the help.

Revision as of 22:22, 8 March 2008

WikiProject iconBiography Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Bond film appearance

This factoid is an error. The imdb page cited for On Her Majesty's secret Service does not include this piece of information, nor can confirmation by found elsewhere on the web, something we can assume it would if true. The only reason to insert this nonsense is to fool the 'mainstream' media. Philip Cross (talk) 20:16, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well well, this claim seems to have appeared on imdb in the last few hours. In the Google cache of 2 March[1] this information was absent. So my original point is (probably) still valid! Philip Cross (talk) 20:37, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea what the story with your cache is, but I read this on the imdb 3 days ago when I heard Ms. Barnes was in a coma and I added it to her page. I can't imagine why you believe your point is more valid than mine! 89.1.90.144 (talk) 22:03, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Where there is doubt it stays out under WP:BLP. If this is true, then another source should be possible to confirm it.--Docg 22:06, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not BLP any more but still and all if there is any doubt let us err on the side of caution. Thanks, SqueakBox 22:16, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK I hear you. I guess it'll get mentioned in the forthcoming obits and then we'll get an additional source. Thanks for the help.