User talk:Kos93: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:45, 10 March 2008

Image tagging for Image:Obuka nbho.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Obuka nbho.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:07, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oznake

Prijatelju vidim da si oznake postavio za komandu obuke,amblemi centara za obuku su odbaceni svi ce imati isti amblem, bez broja i 25 bataljon nece imati takve oznake to je potvrdio i opfor sa foruma sa koga si postovao oznake,25. bataljon VP nece imati crvenu boju na amblemu(ova sadasnja je bordo, a garda hoce crvenu sa zastave) sto bi onda licilo na albanske boje. Sto se tice misija u Avganistanu i Sudanu moras da navedes reference,i nemoj mnogo da uplodujes slike sa sajta vojske jel ce se zaliti.

Boki13

Image:Serbian Ground Force.png

Ova slika ti ima jednu gresku komanda kopnenih snaga je u Nisu a ne Beogradu proveri na sajtu vojske.

Boki13 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Boki13 (talk • contribs) 12:08, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sp.brig

A nisi ni specijalnu brigadu uneo ,uneo si samo 2 bataljona a ima ih pet,pogledaj stranu o specijalnoj brigadi,

Command
Commanding Battalion
63rd Paratroop Battalion
72nd Reconnaissance-commando Battalion ( ovde treba Reconnaissance-commando Battalion)
Antiterrorist Battalion
Logistics company

fali ti jos i ovo 21. Liaison Battalion a ti si napisao 21.Signal.

Rekoh ti da je 72 zove sad 72nd Reconnaissance-commando Battalion,a ti si napisao 72 assault a mogao bi da stavis i ovaj sa palavom pozadinom logo avijacije umesto onog Image:Znak rvpvo.jpg,umesto onog na semi rganizacije rvpvo Boki13 14:52, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:T-55 vs fićo.jpg

How did you obtain the copyright on this image?Geni 21:28, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Savet

Savetujem ti da izbegavas da stavljas slike gde se vide rdja na vozilima,dotrajale garaze i skladista kao sa onim BVP sa maljutkama i gde se na uniformama vide oznake VJ,za ovo prvo da se nesramotimo a ovo drugo ipak reprezentujemo VS ovde sa novim obelezjem.

Boki13 20:30, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recna Flotila

Daj bre klinci vi niste normalni koja recna flotila posebna komanda kad je ona u okviru komande prve brigade ,em jos u okviru kova,nema Srbija vise mornaricu to je samo namenska jedinica od 4 minolovca i 2 desantna camca malo procitajte nesto pre nego sto bilo sta menjate ili pitajte nekog! --Boki13 16:43, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ipak, posebna komanda i nije u sastavu 1.brigade........... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.18.62.189 (talk) 21:20, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mislabeling of images

I think you are mislabeling your uploaded images. Please refrain from doing this, as it infringes on the rights of others and give Wikipedia a bad name. I labeled some images {{copyvio}}, and an administrator will look at them shortly. If I'm wrong, please accept apologies. Harald Hansen 09:55, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Zandarmerija

Mali opet se igras se dobro uredjenom stranom kakve hamere ti stavljas u zandarmeriju kad su oni pripali PTJ,sto si dirao dobro uradjenu tabelu.--Boki13 17:57, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Commons

Najbolje da se uclanis u wikipedija commons tu uplodujes slike kao public domen i odatle ih stavis gde hoces na wikipediju.--Boki13 17:03, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate Image:12.gif

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:12.gif, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:12.gif is a duplicate of an already existing article, category or image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:12.gif, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 17:33, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments are invited on a proposal at WP:MILAIR

As an editor who has been active in working on air force-related articles, I’d appreciate your input on a a proposed generic structure for "XYZ Air Force" articles. I’d like to get broader inputs and would appreciate your suggestions on improving the proposal. Thanks, Askari Mark (Talk) 20:10, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IF YOU COULD HELP ME IN ANY WAY

Hi! First I would really thank wikipedia and, foremost, the people that make it going -- people like you. I come from a village in Herzegovina, and throughout this century it has vittnesed many atrosities. So I desided to make a page about it, on wikipedia. Among the thing that I wrote is the genocide aginst the Serbs in 1941, in Prebilovci. And on the title I used genocide -- a user named rijeka, from croatia, has just removed that bit.

600 women and children from my village, were in 1941 slaughtered and thrown into pits near surmanci, the place were virgin mary is said to have apeared. I wrote abut this -- and rijeca removed that bit. Maby he just doesn't want people knowing about it -- that virgin maty alledgedy apears to some Croats were they cilled Serbs during the genocide.

I've also created a page called Prebilovci Massacre, and because of that, he claims, has removed a great bit of my article on Prebilovci. Among that article, he has removed of what happended in 1991; the bodies of thoose who were massacred in 1941 were blown up by a bomb placed there by Croats.

I just think this is unfair. I see it this way: that's he's missusing his power on wikipedia. Chek it put yourself, then contact me and say what do you think.

Yours Very Thruly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by WebsterMasters (talk • contribs) 15:10, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Roland II.jpg

Hello Kos93!

Could you please uplead this image to Wikimedia Commons? Or would you be consent, if I upload this image to Wiki Commons? If yes, which licence tag should be used? -- 84.145.233.87 22:56, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for loading up!! Feel free to add more images! -- 84.145.235.15 16:14, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yugoslav Army order of battle, March 1999

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Yugoslav Army order of battle, March 1999, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 00:29, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:V_g2_prototip.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:V_g2_prototip.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:40, 6 January 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:40, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Military of Kyrgyzstan

Hi Kos. I was the editor that added most of the land forces data to the Kyrgyzstan page. Would you mind adding your sources for the aircraft numbers? Makes it easier for later as the article climbs in quality - no need to search back for refs. Also, was sorry to see the Yugoslav Army order of batlte was deleted - be quite happy to try and get that re-added should you want help with it. Best regards Buckshot06 (talk) 20:47, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Armenian air defense.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Armenian air defense.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 00:05, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Yugoslav Sailors

Category:Yugoslav Sailors, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 01:02, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Yugoslav soldiers

Category:Yugoslav soldiers, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 01:03, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]