Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dylan and Hayden Whitbread: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Davidwr (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
*'''Delete''' Non-notable kiddies. I just moved the page to conform with other twins, since they had two articles. They really don't need the one. [[User:Morhange|Morhange]] ([[User talk:Morhange|talk]]) 00:34, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Non-notable kiddies. I just moved the page to conform with other twins, since they had two articles. They really don't need the one. [[User:Morhange|Morhange]] ([[User talk:Morhange|talk]]) 00:34, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
:'''Question''' - moved from where? Can it be moved back? [[User:davidwr|davidwr]]/<small><small>([[User_talk:davidwr|talk]])/([[Special:Contributions/Davidwr|contribs]])/([[Special:Emailuser/davidwr|e-mail]])</small></small> 00:58, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
:'''Question''' - moved from where? Can it be moved back? [[User:davidwr|davidwr]]/<small><small>([[User_talk:davidwr|talk]])/([[Special:Contributions/Davidwr|contribs]])/([[Special:Emailuser/davidwr|e-mail]])</small></small> 00:58, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
::'''Reply''' - Each twin had their own article: [[Dylan Whitbread]] and [[Hayden Whitbread]], so I combined them here. [[User:Morhange|Morhange]] ([[User talk:Morhange|talk]]) 04:10, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' This should've been PRODded or perhaps even [[WP:SPEEDY|speedied]] rather than AfD'd. Since Morhange obviosly agrees with the prodding, and since but for the fact that there is an AfD in progress, he could have speeded it as the sole editor, I recommend that '''if and only if''' there are no objections within a couple of days days we [[WP:SNOW|snowball]] this puppy. I put a notice of the AfD on [[Talk:List of characters from Coronation Street]]. That is the only article that links to this article. 2 days should be plenty of time to see if anyone can give a good reason to keep this article. [[User:davidwr|davidwr]]/<small><small>([[User_talk:davidwr|talk]])/([[Special:Contributions/Davidwr|contribs]])/([[Special:Emailuser/davidwr|e-mail]])</small></small> 00:58, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' This should've been PRODded or perhaps even [[WP:SPEEDY|speedied]] rather than AfD'd. Since Morhange obviosly agrees with the prodding, and since but for the fact that there is an AfD in progress, he could have speeded it as the sole editor, I recommend that '''if and only if''' there are no objections within a couple of days days we [[WP:SNOW|snowball]] this puppy. I put a notice of the AfD on [[Talk:List of characters from Coronation Street]]. That is the only article that links to this article. 2 days should be plenty of time to see if anyone can give a good reason to keep this article. [[User:davidwr|davidwr]]/<small><small>([[User_talk:davidwr|talk]])/([[Special:Contributions/Davidwr|contribs]])/([[Special:Emailuser/davidwr|e-mail]])</small></small> 00:58, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:10, 26 March 2008

Dylan and Hayden Whitbread

Dylan and Hayden Whitbread (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable. Two year olds? They have no specific or heavy press coverage and have a lone acting gig in their long careers. Lawrence § t/e 17:58, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question - moved from where? Can it be moved back? davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 00:58, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Reply - Each twin had their own article: Dylan Whitbread and Hayden Whitbread, so I combined them here. Morhange (talk) 04:10, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment This should've been PRODded or perhaps even speedied rather than AfD'd. Since Morhange obviosly agrees with the prodding, and since but for the fact that there is an AfD in progress, he could have speeded it as the sole editor, I recommend that if and only if there are no objections within a couple of days days we snowball this puppy. I put a notice of the AfD on Talk:List of characters from Coronation Street. That is the only article that links to this article. 2 days should be plenty of time to see if anyone can give a good reason to keep this article. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 00:58, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]