Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Walter: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 04:10, 30 March 2008

Chris Walter

I created this article, but I'm unsure about genuine notability. I'm taking it to AfD for consensus. h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 01:17, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep Yes it is notable. It requires some clean-up though.--RyRy5 talk 01:39, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This was prematurely closed by SynergeticMaggot (talk · contribs) who argued, "Improper nomination. See reasons for deletion. This is not the proper venue for your concerns," and cited WP:SK. Taking into consideration criterion #1, and good faith for both SyntheticMaggot and HisSpaceResearch, I think the least harm is done by allowing a fuller discussion of the subject's notability. In particular, SyntheticMaggot has not proposed an alternate route for HisSpaceResearch to open up the subject's notability to consensus. I don't believe there is a more appropriate venue than AFD and an early closure just begs for an even more process-oriented meta-discussion at DRV which would likely be turned back to AFD in the end regardless. So let's just wait for a real consensus here in the interests of expediency and simplicity. --Dhartung | Talk 04:10, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
-:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
-<!--Template:Afd top
-Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
-The result was  '''Speedy keep'''. Improper nomination. See [[Wikipedia:Deletion_policy#Reasons_for_deletion|reasons for deletion]]. This is not the proper venue for your concerns. [[User:SynergeticMaggot|SynergeticMaggot]] ([[User talk:SynergeticMaggot|talk]]) 01:50, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
 ===[[Chris Walter]]===
+{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}
 :{{la|Chris Walter}} (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Chris Walter|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Walter]]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Walter|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2008 March 30#{{anchorencode:Chris Walter}}|View log]])</noinclude>
 I created this article, but I'm unsure about genuine notability. I'm taking it to AfD for consensus. '''[[User:HisSpaceResearch|h i s]]'''   <sup>''[[User talk:HisSpaceResearch|s p a c e]]''</sup>   <sub>'''[[Special:Contributions/HisSpaceResearch|r e s e a r c h]]'''</sub> 01:17, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
 *'''Weak Keep''' Yes it is notable. It requires some clean-up though.--<font face="Edwardian Script ITC" size="3">[[User:RyRy5|<font color="blue">RyRy5</font>]]</font> <font face="Edwardian Script ITC" size="3">[[User talk:RyRy5|<font color="red">talk</font>]]</font> 01:39, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
+*'''Comment''' This was prematurely [[WP:DPR#NAC|closed]] by {{user|SynergeticMaggot}} who argued, "Improper nomination. See reasons for deletion. This is not the proper venue for your concerns," and cited [[WP:SK]]. Taking into consideration criterion #1, and good faith for both SyntheticMaggot and HisSpaceResearch, I think the least harm is done by allowing a fuller discussion of the subject's notability. In particular, SyntheticMaggot has not proposed an alternate route for HisSpaceResearch to open up the subject's notability to consensus. I don't believe there is a more appropriate venue than AFD and an early closure just begs for an even more process-oriented meta-discussion at DRV which would likely be turned back to AFD in the end regardless. So let's just wait for a real consensus here in the interests of expediency and simplicity. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 04:10, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
-:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>