Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Chipmunk: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 07:29, 4 April 2008

Reason: Accurately shows the subject, in its environment, in a way that relates to part of the article and is of high quality.
Articles this image appears in: Chipmunk
Creator: EL C

Support as nominator MBisanz ^talk 04:49, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Risker (talk) 04:55, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Motion blur, washed out. Just a snapshot - FPs need to be more than this. --Janke | Talk 06:34, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A picture of a common subject needs to be much more spectacular. Cacophony (talk) 07:03, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I like the picture, but can't support due to the chipmunk's tail being cut off. As said above, for a relatively easily taken image, the quality really has to be top-notch. faithless (^speak) 07:29, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 *'''Oppose''' Motion blur, washed out. Just a snapshot - FPs need to be more than this. --[[User:Janke|Janke]] | [[User talk:Janke|Talk]] 06:34, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 *'''Oppose''' A picture of a common subject needs to be much more spectacular.  [[User:Cacophony|Cacophony]] ([[User talk:Cacophony|talk]]) 07:03, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
+*'''Comment''' I like the picture, but can't support due to the chipmunk's tail being cut off. As said above, for a relatively easily taken image, the quality really has to be top-notch. [[User:Faithlessthewonderboy|<span style="color:blue">'''faithless'''</span>]] [[User talk:Faithlessthewonderboy|<small><span style="color:black">(<sup>'''speak'''</sup>)</span></small>]] 07:29, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 <!-- additional votes go above this line  -->
 {{-}}