Talk:Lilian, Princess of Réthy: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Gryffindor (talk | contribs) post question |
No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
She was never queen-consort, only princess-consort, shouldn't the name of the article be therefore different? like, Lilian, Princess of Rethy or something like that? see [[Albert, Prince Consort]]. [[User:Gryffindor|<font color="red">Gryffindor</font>]] 15:01, 18 January 2008 (UTC) |
She was never queen-consort, only princess-consort, shouldn't the name of the article be therefore different? like, Lilian, Princess of Rethy or something like that? see [[Albert, Prince Consort]]. [[User:Gryffindor|<font color="red">Gryffindor</font>]] 15:01, 18 January 2008 (UTC) |
||
:She was, however, the consort to a king regardless of her title. It's an exception to the rule I'd say, but I would support renaming the article to [[Lilian, princesse de Réthey]] or [[Lilian, Princess of Réthy]] as she held that title as her own, regardless of its technical legality. [[User talk:Charles|Charles]] 17:55, 12 April 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:55, 12 April 2008
Biography: Royalty and Nobility B‑class | ||||||||||
|
What was the first name of Cardinal Van Roey? -- Zoe
She was never queen-consort, only princess-consort, shouldn't the name of the article be therefore different? like, Lilian, Princess of Rethy or something like that? see Albert, Prince Consort. Gryffindor 15:01, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
- She was, however, the consort to a king regardless of her title. It's an exception to the rule I'd say, but I would support renaming the article to Lilian, princesse de Réthey or Lilian, Princess of Réthy as she held that title as her own, regardless of its technical legality. Charles 17:55, 12 April 2008 (UTC)