Jump to content

Talk:Ultraviolet blood irradiation: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by 141.156.170.187 - ""
Line 4: Line 4:
I have tried to answer the deletion note by adding references and bibliographic items. However, the references are not showing up correctly yet. There is much more to be said about this therapy, but I thought that a useful (and long-overdue) first step would be to provide a simple, straightforward account that others could then build on.[[User:Kjdillon|Kjdillon]] ([[User talk:Kjdillon|talk]]) 07:06, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
I have tried to answer the deletion note by adding references and bibliographic items. However, the references are not showing up correctly yet. There is much more to be said about this therapy, but I thought that a useful (and long-overdue) first step would be to provide a simple, straightforward account that others could then build on.[[User:Kjdillon|Kjdillon]] ([[User talk:Kjdillon|talk]]) 07:06, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
:I've cut down the size of the article quite substantially as it made a lot of [[WP:OR|unreferenced statements]] and was written in a fairly promotional style. I've reduced it to a brief summary just based on the sources given. ~ <font color="#000000">[[User:Mazca|<font color="#228b22">'''m'''a'''z'''c'''a'''</font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Mazca|<font color="#000000">''t''a''l''k</font>]]</sup></font> 17:48, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
:I've cut down the size of the article quite substantially as it made a lot of [[WP:OR|unreferenced statements]] and was written in a fairly promotional style. I've reduced it to a brief summary just based on the sources given. ~ <font color="#000000">[[User:Mazca|<font color="#228b22">'''m'''a'''z'''c'''a'''</font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Mazca|<font color="#000000">''t''a''l''k</font>]]</sup></font> 17:48, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
:Unfortunately, the 1953 JAMA article was embarrassingly unscientific; and there have been more than 100 articles published in German and Russian journals since 1990 that provide clinical trial reports of the use of UBI in several dozen indications. Citations to many of these articles can be found in my three books wholly or largely on UBI. So the article as currently written is inaccurate and misleading. [[User:Kjdillon|Kjdillon]] ([[User talk:Kjdillon|talk]])14:21, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
:Unfortunately, the 1953 JAMA article was embarrassingly unscientific; and there have been more than 100 articles published in German and Russian journals since 1990 that provide clinical trial reports of the use of UBI in several dozen indications. Citations to many of these articles can be found in my three books wholly or largely on UBI. So the article as currently written is inaccurate and misleading. [[User:Kjdillon|Kjdillon]] ([[User talk:Kjdillon|talk]])14:21, 30 June 2008 (UTC) <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/141.156.170.187|141.156.170.187]] ([[User talk:141.156.170.187|talk]]) </small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Revision as of 18:24, 30 June 2008

Notifications

Summary

I have tried to answer the deletion note by adding references and bibliographic items. However, the references are not showing up correctly yet. There is much more to be said about this therapy, but I thought that a useful (and long-overdue) first step would be to provide a simple, straightforward account that others could then build on.Kjdillon (talk) 07:06, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've cut down the size of the article quite substantially as it made a lot of unreferenced statements and was written in a fairly promotional style. I've reduced it to a brief summary just based on the sources given. ~ mazca talk 17:48, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, the 1953 JAMA article was embarrassingly unscientific; and there have been more than 100 articles published in German and Russian journals since 1990 that provide clinical trial reports of the use of UBI in several dozen indications. Citations to many of these articles can be found in my three books wholly or largely on UBI. So the article as currently written is inaccurate and misleading. Kjdillon (talk)14:21, 30 June 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.156.170.187 (talk) [reply]