User talk:Endimion17: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:14, 25 August 2008

Image copyright problem with Image:WRM_enc1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:WRM_enc1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:56, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Girl from Tomorrow

Hi, Thanks for the extra info added to this page.

--NeilEvans 12:48, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Images

I have deleted Image:WRM enc1.jpg and Image:WRM enc2.jpg, images scanned from an unknown encyclopedia (about the Warsaw radio mast). I think the images were copyrighted, but not allowed for any purpose as your licence suggested.--Commander Keane 01:26, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, the images can be undeleted if they turn out to be ok.

Is the image free? We don't know so we can't use it in Wikipedia.

Could the image be used under Wikipedia:Fair use? Well, it is a copy of an encyclopedia - limiting their ability to sell that encyclopedia so it is unlikely.

Placing {{copyrightedFreeUse}} was an error (either a lie or mistake or whatever).--Commander Keane 02:58, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warsaw Radio Mast images

I marked the following for deletion as I think they're a copyright violation, there's no proof that the website owner released the rights. You can't assume what's the license if it's not explicitly named on the page.

--Wanted 19:45, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NO2 absurdity

Your comments about common sensical description of NO₂ were welcome to me, although your personal experiences with this material are however not admissable, of course. Unfortunately, Wikipedia-chemistry is significantly influenced by zealots and the ability to Google supporting literature that "makes" their case.--Smokefoot (talk) 17:14, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 36: / Line 36: @@
 </gallery>
 --[[User:Wanted|Wanted]] 19:45, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
+==NO2 absurdity==
+Your comments about common sensical description of NO<sub>2</sub> were welcome to me,  although your personal experiences with this material are however not admissable, of course. Unfortunately, Wikipedia-chemistry is significantly influenced by zealots and the ability to Google supporting literature that "makes" their case.--[[User:Smokefoot|Smokefoot]] ([[User talk:Smokefoot|talk]]) 17:14, 25 August 2008 (UTC)