Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Metallica: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
renaming
(No difference)

Revision as of 02:27, 26 September 2008

List of awards and nominations received by Metallica

Gary King (talk) 18:56, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 10:25, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments - sources look okay. Links checked out with the link checker tool. Ealdgyth - Talk 12:44, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support - unbelievable, I can't find any flaws and meets the FL Criteria.--SRX 13:45, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 18:55, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose mainly the lead...

  • Kerrang awards should be linked in the infobox.
  • Similar to other comments I may have made in the past, 1/2 of the lead is a discog. For a band with 19 wins in these awards, I'd expect more about the awards (per the list title) than the discog.
  • " with five of them" - perhaps it's my addled brain, but I'm not sure the "with" is needed here.
  • " outstanding achievements in the record industry." says who? cite it, reword it, you know the score.

The Rambling Man (talk) 17:38, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alright all done. Second lead paragraph expanded significantly. Gary King (talk) 18:08, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • "They have also received" - Metallica has been singular until this point.
  • Same for "they were not nominated for another Juno Award"...

The Rambling Man (talk) 18:51, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah yes; all done Gary King (talk) 18:53, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support my issues dealt with. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:55, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Does the title refer to what the award is made of, or the band? :) Matthewedwards (talk contribs  email) 01:34, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]