Jump to content

User talk:Maxim: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
re
Line 1: Line 1:
*[[/archives|Archives]]
*[[/archives|Archives]]
*[[User:Maxim/Articles written|Articles written]]
*[[User:Maxim/Articles written|Articles written]]
*[[User:Maxim/Sandbox|Sandbox]]


== Deleted Star Trek image ==
== Deleted Star Trek image ==
Line 11: Line 12:


Hi, I did everything you requested in MLBs GA review. Cheers.--[[User:LAAFan|<font color="red" face="Times New Roman">LAA</font>]][[User talk:LAAFan|<font color="black" face="Times New Roman">Fan</font>]]''<sup>[[User:LAAFan/Guestbook|sign]]</sup> <sub>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/LAAFan 2|review]]''</sub> 01:20, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I did everything you requested in MLBs GA review. Cheers.--[[User:LAAFan|<font color="red" face="Times New Roman">LAA</font>]][[User talk:LAAFan|<font color="black" face="Times New Roman">Fan</font>]]''<sup>[[User:LAAFan/Guestbook|sign]]</sup> <sub>[[Wikipedia:Editor review/LAAFan 2|review]]''</sub> 01:20, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
:It's very good, ideally we should eliminate the see also. See my comments and two edits to the article. '''<font face="Arial">[[Special:Contributions/Maxim|<font color="#FF7133">Maxim</font>]]<sub><small>[[User talk:Maxim|<font color="blue">(talk)</font>]]</small></sub></font>''' 12:53, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:53, 4 October 2008

Deleted Star Trek image

It seems we meet again! Would you be able to restore (I hope that link works!) "Image:TNG combadge.JPG", so that I may update its fair-use rationale for inclusion in Communicator (Star Trek)? Please let me know if any problems arise. — OranL (talk) 00:10, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, I'm considering making User talk:Maxim/OranL. ;-) (Oh and don't forget the archives for that subpage :p Maxim(talk) 00:16, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know if the servers could handle that large of an archive…. Thanks for restoring the image! — OranL (talk) 01:55, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I did everything you requested in MLBs GA review. Cheers.--LAAFansign review 01:20, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's very good, ideally we should eliminate the see also. See my comments and two edits to the article. Maxim(talk) 12:53, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]