Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Demon (The Cave): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
DGG (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.'''</span><br/><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Ron Ritzman|Ron Ritzman]] ([[User talk:Ron Ritzman|talk]]) 00:31, 10 October 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.'''</span><br/><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Ron Ritzman|Ron Ritzman]] ([[User talk:Ron Ritzman|talk]]) 00:31, 10 October 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
*'''Merge''' as the major plot element in the film, the information should be combined--some of it would help explain the signifcance of the film. The name is not distinctive, and I see no need for a redirect.'''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG|talk]]) 18:00, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
*'''Merge''' as the major plot element in the film, the information should be combined--some of it would help explain the signifcance of the film. The name is not distinctive, and I see no need for a redirect.'''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG|talk]]) 18:00, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Film|list of Film-related deletion discussions]]. </small><small>—[[User:PC78|PC78]] ([[User talk:PC78|talk]]) 11:44, 11 October 2008 (UTC)</small>

Revision as of 11:44, 11 October 2008

Demon (The Cave)

Demon (The Cave) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This fictional species does not establish notability independent of its film. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 19:39, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:31, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge as the major plot element in the film, the information should be combined--some of it would help explain the signifcance of the film. The name is not distinctive, and I see no need for a redirect.DGG (talk) 18:00, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. PC78 (talk) 11:44, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]